Watching the drama unfold regarding Threads' promise/threat to federate with mastodon and all I can think is, why are we trying so hard to smoosh everyone back into the same place again? Communities don't work like that. Smooshing everyone together causes all the problems that plague internet communities. It's good to have separate places for separate communities. Stop trying to cram everyone together! IT NEVER WORKS.
It's also funny to me that the excuse for all that smooshing before was that the ad model demanded it. More people = more value = more expensive ads to sell! But mastodon is not ad supported so why the fuck do we want interop with ad-driven companies? Just to make us feel like big important adults? THAT'S WHAT THERAPY IS FOR.
@fraying The outlines of real communities rarely line up with the boundaries of social networking apps. The whole point of federation is that I can connect with people I care about across software and service boundaries.
Point is, communities have boundaries. That's what makes them communities. And there's good reason to have the friction of creating a new account, agreeing to the community guidelines, and getting to know a new place. That's part of what makes communities communities.
Maybe we should think twice before turning on a spigot we can't turn off.
I know, there are lots of fediverse projects, it's not just mastodon. All of them are virgin hills full of gold and we're seeing miners with pickaxes on the horizon and it's SO WEIRD to see them being welcomed as if they're not going to mine this place hollow just like they have every other place we've let them take up residence.
I fully understand what Threads/Meta sees in mastodon because it's what they always see: unclaimed eyeballs and the money they can make by selling those eyeballs to the highest bidder.
But what do we get? We get to follow Instagram accounts here? THAT'S WHAT INSTAGRAM IS FOR. Why would I want that shit in my stream? Instagram fucking sucks.
We get to be followed by the thirsty creeps on Threads? NO THANK YOU. Threads sucks, too, and if I wanted my words there, I'd post them there.
@evan@fraying Exactly. The idea of siloed communities is rather antithetical to Mastodon's mission and messaging. The whole point has always been connect to many places from one account. Of the 20 posts I scroll by on my home feed right now, they come from 20 different servers, some not even Mastodon. I don't have an account on each of them.
@fraying I'm happy to follow you, but I didn't sign up for an xoxo.zone account to do it. I don't have accounts on the 12,000 known fediverse servers. I can just follow everyone from right here at cosocial. I like that.
@evan What does "connect" even mean anymore? They can "connect" to us by creating masto accounts like everyone else. If they don't do that, then connecting with us doesn't seem that important to them, does it?
@fraying right, but I'm sure you're also aware that I've been working on decentralized social networks for a couple of decades, now, and I really do believe they offer advantages for users and communities. Not least, because they put people and communities ahead of apps and servers. I realize that's not something you agree with, which is a good challenge to my orthodoxy. So I'm trying to make sure I can explain why I think connecting across service and software boundaries is a good thing.
@wolf480pl@Gargron@fraying that's fair but only partially true. ActivityPub has support for groups, and we have a few out there, but we need an upgrade to allow, for example, member-only posts. Also, Mastodon has lists, so you can group up your contacts, but they're not addressable (yet). We'll get there.
@Gargron@evan@fraying except the only way to place community boundaries with mastodon is to place them at instance boundaries. Everything - moderation, timelines, post visibility - is per-user then per-instance. There's no groups of any kind. I can't send one post to "my friends interested in electronics" and another to "my friends interested in Polish politics", unless I make two accounts, which defeats the whole point....
@danielhz@fraying@wolf480pl@Gargron so, there's good news and bad news. The good news is that we have public groups that work really simple at services like @groups. Private groups don't work well on ActivityPub yet, but I think we'll see some work on it in 2024.
@fraying@evan@wolf480pl@Gargron Groups are something I would really like to have. I would like to share pictures of birds with the bird lovers' group, and share pictures of spiders with the spider lovers' group. When living in Denmark, people used Facebook groups a lot, for sport clubs and for the neighborhood. I would have been happy if I could have accessed those groups from my own ActivityPub instance.