My wife is looking forward to deleting her Instagram account once she can connect with the same folks from her Mastodon account. Being able to remain in touch with over 100M people who still use Meta products out of the comfort of an ad-free, privacy-friendly platform like Mastodon is a game changer.
@theLUCASTDS@Gargron In reality most big accounts on Threads just won't care enough to opt in, imo. If they're even aware that the option exists, that is.
@nileane@Gargron a lot of Mastodon servers are doing the same thing right back to Threads. If people on threads want to be able to communicate with Mastodon they will opt in. I would imagine most news sites & reporters will keep their audience as big as possible
@timo21 People don’t like seeing links to Twitter on here because it’s a non-interoperable platform and they are one way and commonly not official. That’s the opposite of the Threads situation.
@Gargron the rub will be boosting posts that come from threads. Just like most people on mastodon don't like to see posts with links to Xitter, they won't want to see boosts that include twitter accounts.
@Gargron I left Meta years ago(then twitter a year ago) because of the spread of hate. Don't want to encounter it again. There are a lot of nice peoplehere. This will be bad. Sorry. @timo21
@Gargron@timo21 "People don’t like seeing links to Twitter on here because it’s a non-interoperable platform" -- People don't like seeing links to T/X here bc it's run by a fascist nutjob
@Gargron many people would like to get more in depth information about this, e.g. what happens to privacies of a post's content or posted media, which are shown on a Threads feed, bc a person from "there" follows a person from "here" or it got reposted? E.g.: Since the launch of "Imagine", Meta announced, that they use every image for their AI, unless you switched your account in time to "private". Why would they stop with just collecting image data?
I hope that an organization as massive as Meta adopting #ActivityPub will send a signal that pushes Tumblr and other platforms that have been considering it over the edge in doing the same. Perhaps even Bluesky would consider replacing or at least supplementing their custom protocol with the @w3c standard for interoperability.
@Gargron it does and the arguments against it sound NIMBYish. isn’t the point of all this to have other things from outside connect? and if it doesn’t work out, isn’t there a way to disconnect? i’m all for social media going next level. maybe it’s naive, i don’t know all the tech behind this but i dream of not having a bunch of social media sites and still being able to reach all the content i do through google / reddit. this used to be IRC, why can’t it be something else next?
@Gargron@w3c Is there any good reason why they can’t do both? Are their personal feed algos able to operated efficiently enough via AP if they want to enough?
@Gargron Sounds great, but @mosseri has recently said Threads is working towards its users having to opt in to Fediverse visibility. To me this is a total non-starter. 99% of users are not going to do that, especially if it’s a switch hidden somewhere in the settings menu.
There is so much more to this than interoperability. Both Twitter and Meta have strengthened the spread of disinformation and the forces that endanger democracy on an industrial scale. Mastodon with its different model is a fundamental alternative to that - and for a lot of people that‘s why they invest time and effort here, not there. Once connected, Mastodon won‘t be a systemic alternative any more, like a local food coop becoming a Walmart stall.
@NickBohle@Gargron@photomatt BTW, that was his answer to my email question to them - and I was very impressed with the detail and thoroughnesses of his response…
I very much doubt that, legally speaking, #OptOut would be permissible in the #EuropeanUnion. There have been several decisions by #CJEU. #DoubleOptIn is the standard for e-mail newsletters. Given the fact that #Threats is nothing but a giant, data-grabbing #SpamEngine, I would highly doubt that #CJEU would see it much differently.
Also, even though the #Fediverse is free of charge, people register on a server due to the instance rules...
...at that moment. Huge communities (e.g. #LGBTQIA+) came here not to be harassed by MAGATs et al. Changing the fine print might not work either, as this constitutes a major change an could be considered an invalid surprise clause in many countries.
Erring on the wrong side of #GDPDR (#DSGVO) might prove costly when decided upon by the #CJEU some years in the future.
I'd say opting for #OptOut as an instance might be a considerable business risk. //
@fixatedpersonsunit@Gargron That's literally the same information every #Mastodon instance collects when you interact with its users. If another site can't collect/store account-identifying info, it can't manage interactions like follows and blocks!
You're overreacting to the fact that #Threads has a more accurate Terms of Service than any other federated site.
@fixatedpersonsunit@Gargron That's neither here nor there, in regards to your complaint about those Terms of Service. There's nothing ominous in those TOS.
I think if you had real confidence in your moral arguments against federating with #Threads, you would lead with those arguments instead of misrepresenting a legal document.
I do believe that we will probably see more government institutions, private organizations, political leaders & famous celebrities who are running #WordPress enter the Fediverse (via the plugin).
I know #Flipboard will enter the Fediverse soon, but I am not sure when (or if‽) #PostNews & #Flickr will join.
@Gargron@w3c There are a handful of people I really enjoyed reading/interacting with from twitler who are now exclusive with Threads.After Federation, will I be able to simply follow them from my Mastodon account? If so, this seems pretty cool indeed.