GNU social JP
  • FAQ
  • Login
GNU social JPは日本のGNU socialサーバーです。
Usage/ToS/admin/test/Pleroma FE
  • Public

    • Public
    • Network
    • Groups
    • Featured
    • Popular
    • People

Conversation

Notices

  1. Embed this notice
    Shantini (shantini@techhub.social)'s status on Saturday, 16-Dec-2023 17:32:04 JST Shantini Shantini

    Mastodon users: everything should be federated!

    Also Mastodon users: no not you

    In conversation Saturday, 16-Dec-2023 17:32:04 JST from techhub.social permalink
    • Doughnut Lollipop 【記録係】:blobfoxgooglymlem: likes this.
    • Embed this notice
      Max Leibman (maxleibman@mastodon.social)'s status on Saturday, 16-Dec-2023 17:35:44 JST Max Leibman Max Leibman
      in reply to
      • M.S. Bellows, Jr.

      @msbellows I don't know the OP's intent, but I hear it not just in the context of blocking Threads (fine, whatever, do or don’t; I don't like Meta, either). Rather, what I see reflected there is the complete asshattery of people who've said, “We need to block any instance that doesn't block Threads!” (or even further). Which is a burn-the-village-to-save-the-village sentiment if I've ever seen one.

      In conversation Saturday, 16-Dec-2023 17:35:44 JST permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Max Leibman (maxleibman@mastodon.social)'s status on Saturday, 16-Dec-2023 17:35:45 JST Max Leibman Max Leibman
      in reply to
      • M.S. Bellows, Jr.

      @msbellows Neither I nor the OP said anything about tolerating bad actors or bad behavior. I like what she said because it calls attention to Fediverse partisans’ obliviousness to the tradeoffs in the designs of this place—like how people talk about defederation like it's a clean, simple, pure solution, as though it has no negative consequences.

      (EDIT: The first version of this reply started out unnecessarily aggressive, so I took it out, and I apologize. The rest I stand by.)

      In conversation Saturday, 16-Dec-2023 17:35:45 JST permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Max Leibman (maxleibman@mastodon.social)'s status on Saturday, 16-Dec-2023 17:35:46 JST Max Leibman Max Leibman
      in reply to

      @shantini I’m gonna need a bigger boost button for this one…

      In conversation Saturday, 16-Dec-2023 17:35:46 JST permalink
      Tokyo Outsider (337ppm) repeated this.
    • Embed this notice
      M.S. Bellows, Jr. (msbellows@c.im)'s status on Saturday, 16-Dec-2023 17:35:46 JST M.S. Bellows, Jr. M.S. Bellows, Jr.
      in reply to
      • Max Leibman

      @maxleibman @shantini I respectfully disagree. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_tolerance

      In conversation Saturday, 16-Dec-2023 17:35:46 JST permalink

      Attachments

      1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: upload.wikimedia.org
        Paradox of tolerance
        The paradox of tolerance states that if a society's practice of tolerance is inclusive of the intolerant, intolerance will ultimately dominate, eliminating the tolerant and the practice of tolerance with them. Karl Popper describes the paradox as arising from the seemingly self-contradictory idea that, in order to maintain a tolerant society, the society must retain the right to be intolerant of intolerance. Formulation Tolerance is characterized by three traits, as enumerated by Preston King: An objection component, wherein the object of toleration is objectionable. For instance, a follower of one faith may assert the beliefs of another faith are wrong. An acceptance component, which does not resolve the objection but instead offers positive reasons for overlooking it, e.g. social harmony. A rejection component, which defines the limits of tolerance, at what point the positive reasons are outweighed by the objection.The paradox of tolerance concerns the rejection component. Most formulations of tolerance assert that tolerance is a reciprocal act, and the...
    • Embed this notice
      Raccoon🏳️‍🌈 (raccoon@techhub.social)'s status on Saturday, 16-Dec-2023 17:38:37 JST Raccoon🏳️‍🌈 Raccoon🏳️‍🌈
      in reply to

      @shantini
      So, speaking as a moderator of your instance, you are on the right instance: we aren't blocking Threads unless they do something that actually causes problems, like if they don't fix their damn implementation by the time they try to query posts from us, or if they don't fix their moderation problems that are making people not want to be on their platform and it becomes our issue.

      That said, I think it's not only entirely acceptable that other instances are blocking, especially these small, safety oriented instances, but it's actually how things were intended to be run from the design point. If they don't want to have to deal with the potential bullshit coming out of Threads, they shouldn't have to, and they have the right to decide that because it's their servers. That's the beauty of decentralized networks.

      Threads doesn't have much to offer to the average user anyway, mostly ads and influencers: most of the interesting stuff is on Fedi.

      In conversation Saturday, 16-Dec-2023 17:38:37 JST permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Shantini (shantini@techhub.social)'s status on Saturday, 16-Dec-2023 17:38:38 JST Shantini Shantini
      in reply to

      Mastodon users: everyone is welcome here!

      Also Mastodon users: no not you

      In conversation Saturday, 16-Dec-2023 17:38:38 JST permalink
      Tokyo Outsider (337ppm) repeated this.

Feeds

  • Activity Streams
  • RSS 2.0
  • Atom
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.