GNU social JP
  • FAQ
  • Login
GNU social JPは日本のGNU socialサーバーです。
Usage/ToS/admin/test/Pleroma FE
  • Public

    • Public
    • Network
    • Groups
    • Featured
    • Popular
    • People

Conversation

Notices

  1. Embed this notice
    Charlie Stross (cstross@wandering.shop)'s status on Friday, 08-Dec-2023 21:34:46 JST Charlie Stross Charlie Stross

    Hollywood vs. Reality: space station edition

    In conversation Friday, 08-Dec-2023 21:34:46 JST from wandering.shop permalink

    Attachments


    1. https://stockroom.wandering.shop/media_attachments/files/111/544/578/263/479/061/original/94bb8ee9bf0994fa.jpeg

    2. https://stockroom.wandering.shop/media_attachments/files/111/544/578/542/981/118/original/dc6ee5eac3529084.jpeg
    • clacke likes this.
    • Embed this notice
      Sepideh (sepdroid@androiddev.social)'s status on Friday, 08-Dec-2023 21:34:48 JST Sepideh Sepideh
      in reply to

      @cstross Space needs more Marie Kondo.

      In conversation Friday, 08-Dec-2023 21:34:48 JST permalink
      clacke likes this.
    • Embed this notice
      ǝlqɯnɹ uoɯᴉS (shermozle@aus.social)'s status on Friday, 08-Dec-2023 21:34:49 JST ǝlqɯnɹ uoɯᴉS ǝlqɯnɹ uoɯᴉS
      in reply to

      @cstross
      Makes me feel way happier about my perennially messy workspaces...

      In conversation Friday, 08-Dec-2023 21:34:49 JST permalink
      clacke likes this.
    • Embed this notice
      Charlie Stross (cstross@wandering.shop)'s status on Friday, 08-Dec-2023 21:34:52 JST Charlie Stross Charlie Stross
      in reply to
      • ailepet

      @ailepet The ISS core was originally going to be called Mir 2, then the USSR imploded and paying Roscosmos to launch the pieces gave NASA an orbital construction shack (while they played catch-up) and kept a bunch of Russian rocket scientists in paid work so they didn't emigrate to China or North Korea.

      In conversation Friday, 08-Dec-2023 21:34:52 JST permalink
      clacke likes this.
    • Embed this notice
      ailepet (ailepet@peoplemaking.games)'s status on Friday, 08-Dec-2023 21:34:54 JST ailepet ailepet
      in reply to

      @cstross That's because we followed the Mir-influenced school of space station interior design, instead of Raymond Loewy's designs for Skylab (I guess?)

      In conversation Friday, 08-Dec-2023 21:34:54 JST permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Slothdude (slothdude@mastodon.online)'s status on Friday, 08-Dec-2023 21:34:56 JST Slothdude Slothdude
      in reply to

      @cstross Not visible in the picture: the smell.

      In conversation Friday, 08-Dec-2023 21:34:56 JST permalink
      clacke likes this.
    • Embed this notice
      Robert Petersen :startrek: (sonikku@techhub.social)'s status on Friday, 08-Dec-2023 21:34:58 JST Robert Petersen :startrek: Robert Petersen :startrek:
      in reply to
      • Slothdude

      @slothdude @cstross or the sound. I’ve heard it’s never ever quiet, always whrring and buzzing and clunking

      In conversation Friday, 08-Dec-2023 21:34:58 JST permalink
      clacke likes this.
    • Embed this notice
      Chris Armstrong (rhodium103@mastodon.social)'s status on Friday, 08-Dec-2023 21:35:01 JST Chris Armstrong Chris Armstrong
      in reply to

      @cstross
      Also feels like The Expanse on screen vs the books, as the adaption has fairly typical sci-fi sets, and the book is like "It was the largest office he had seen in space, 2 metres wide..."

      In conversation Friday, 08-Dec-2023 21:35:01 JST permalink
      clacke likes this.
    • Embed this notice
      -dsr- (dashdsrdash@tilde.zone)'s status on Friday, 08-Dec-2023 21:35:04 JST -dsr- -dsr-
      in reply to

      @cstross

      There's a SF/comedy series, Avenue 5, in which the passengers ride around in the Apple Store picture and the crew below live and work in the second picture.

      In fact, the captain and the shiny bridge crew are all actors...

      In conversation Friday, 08-Dec-2023 21:35:04 JST permalink

      Attachments


      clacke likes this.
    • Embed this notice
      clacke (clacke@libranet.de)'s status on Friday, 08-Dec-2023 21:35:06 JST clacke clacke
      in reply to
      • -dsr-
      @dashdsrdash @cstross Love Avenue 5.
      In conversation Friday, 08-Dec-2023 21:35:06 JST permalink
    • Embed this notice
      HighlandLawyer (highlandlawyer@mastodon.social)'s status on Friday, 08-Dec-2023 21:35:10 JST HighlandLawyer HighlandLawyer
      in reply to

      @cstross Production version versus prototype.
      (Although the Nostromo is probably a better comparison as a work rather than passenger/consumer production version)

      In conversation Friday, 08-Dec-2023 21:35:10 JST permalink
      clacke likes this.
    • Embed this notice
      HairyChris (hairychris@mastodon.world)'s status on Friday, 08-Dec-2023 23:30:33 JST HairyChris HairyChris
      in reply to

      @cstross Oh, as long as they focus on the commercial launches they should be OK. The fancy lunar/martian part of Starship won't work.

      Twitter is on it's arse. Tesla is overvalued as an auto maker, and has lost it's edge in actual tech so there is going to be a reckoning there some point.

      How SpaceX survives will be an interesting watch, especially wrt any projects strongly linked to Musk's over-promise-under-deliver technobabble schtick!

      In conversation Friday, 08-Dec-2023 23:30:33 JST permalink
      clacke likes this.
    • Embed this notice
      Charlie Stross (cstross@wandering.shop)'s status on Friday, 08-Dec-2023 23:30:35 JST Charlie Stross Charlie Stross
      in reply to
      • HairyChris

      @HairyChris SpaceX currently has 70-80% of the GLOBAL space launch market sewn up tight.

      Musk self-destructing ... well, as SpaceX is basically run by Gwynne Shotwell, getting rid of Musk might make things run more smoothly.

      In conversation Friday, 08-Dec-2023 23:30:35 JST permalink
      clacke likes this.
    • Embed this notice
      HairyChris (hairychris@mastodon.world)'s status on Friday, 08-Dec-2023 23:30:36 JST HairyChris HairyChris
      in reply to

      @cstross Maybe, but the NASA funding for Spaceship's lunar stuff is dependent on them hitting some very precise targets (which SpaceX & Musk signed up to). They got ~$3bn and must have blown through most of that, with many more launches required.

      They didn't hit LEO last time either.

      I wonder how much cash SpaceX has, and whether it can fully self-fund Starship. Any engines used here can't be used for their commercial shipments.

      Plus if Musk self-destructs the jury is out on everything.

      In conversation Friday, 08-Dec-2023 23:30:36 JST permalink
      clacke repeated this.
    • Embed this notice
      Charlie Stross (cstross@wandering.shop)'s status on Friday, 08-Dec-2023 23:30:37 JST Charlie Stross Charlie Stross
      in reply to
      • HairyChris

      @HairyChris Naah, Starship's going to fly again within a month or two: the last test achieved most of its goals and SpaceX (currently floating with a valuation of $175Bn) absolutely needs it to launch the Starlink 2 cluster (the new sats are too big to fly economically on Falcon 9). I reckon they'll lose at most 1-2 more prototypes during the test program then get it working smoothly.

      In conversation Friday, 08-Dec-2023 23:30:37 JST permalink
      clacke likes this.
    • Embed this notice
      HairyChris (hairychris@mastodon.world)'s status on Friday, 08-Dec-2023 23:30:38 JST HairyChris HairyChris
      in reply to

      @cstross Oh yes, for sure. Totally inefficient use of voulme ramps up the cost to orbit too!

      And Starship? Yes, it's a chonker but I don't see it working ever. It's looking like NASA isn't going to give them any more cash...

      In conversation Friday, 08-Dec-2023 23:30:38 JST permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Charlie Stross (cstross@wandering.shop)'s status on Friday, 08-Dec-2023 23:30:40 JST Charlie Stross Charlie Stross
      in reply to
      • HairyChris

      @HairyChris Don't forget the size of payload shrouds and the space shuttle's payload bay—while there's a prototype expandable module docked to the ISS (BEAM) most of the modules are rigid metal pressure vessels that had to fit inside a launch vehicle's payload.

      (Starship, with a 9m diameter, is a huge increase over the Shuttle's 4.6M wide payload bay.)

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bigelow_Expandable_Activity_Module

      In conversation Friday, 08-Dec-2023 23:30:40 JST permalink

      Attachments

      1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: upload.wikimedia.org
        Bigelow Expandable Activity Module
        The Bigelow Expandable Activity Module (BEAM) is an experimental expandable space station module developed by Bigelow Aerospace, under contract to NASA, for testing as a temporary module on the International Space Station (ISS) from 2016 to at most 2028, when the contract can not be extended any further. It arrived at the ISS on 10 April 2016, was berthed to the station on 16 April 2016, and was expanded and pressurized on 28 May 2016. Although originally planned to be a two year test, it has exceeded expectations and is used as additional cargo storage. The module is under ownership of NASA after Bigelow Aerospace suspended operations in 2021. History NASA originally considered the idea of inflatable habitats in the 1960s, and developed the TransHab inflatable module concept in the late 1990s. The TransHab project was canceled by Congress in 2000, and Bigelow Aerospace purchased the rights to the patents developed by NASA to pursue private space station designs. In 2006 and 2007, Bigelow launched two demonstration modules to Earth orbit, Genesis I and Genesis II.NASA re-initiated analysis...
    • Embed this notice
      HairyChris (hairychris@mastodon.world)'s status on Friday, 08-Dec-2023 23:30:41 JST HairyChris HairyChris
      in reply to

      @cstross Ah, the joy of a massive $/lb rate to get crap into orbit!

      In conversation Friday, 08-Dec-2023 23:30:41 JST permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Rachel Greenham (strangenoises@mastodon.social)'s status on Friday, 08-Dec-2023 23:30:53 JST Rachel Greenham Rachel Greenham
      in reply to
      • Zach Weinersmith

      @cstross in fairness if we're going to do mad things like go to mars we're going to need to do it in something that earns the name of "ship”, not the barely-afloat row-boats we've been using so far. like we needed ships to get across the oceans, notwithstanding the odd nutter in a rowboat (with GPS and satellite radio and rescue services on-hand).

      wait and go big, as @ZachWeinersmith & Kelly say…

      In conversation Friday, 08-Dec-2023 23:30:53 JST permalink
      clacke likes this.
    • Embed this notice
      Charlie Stross (cstross@wandering.shop)'s status on Saturday, 09-Dec-2023 19:38:06 JST Charlie Stross Charlie Stross
      in reply to
      • Ricardo B�nffy
      • HairyChris

      @rbanffy @HairyChris Boeing as it used to be is dead—eaten from the inside-out by McDonnell-Douglas management after the merger and reconfigured in McD-D's image, they're now a bloated trad defense industry contractor who can't innovate or build spacegoing hardware to spec and on time.

      In conversation Saturday, 09-Dec-2023 19:38:06 JST permalink
      clacke likes this.
    • Embed this notice
      Ricardo B�nffy (rbanffy@mastodon.social)'s status on Saturday, 09-Dec-2023 19:38:08 JST Ricardo B�nffy Ricardo B�nffy
      in reply to
      • HairyChris

      @cstross @HairyChris I can't wait to see what Bigelow(Boeing?) can fit inside a Starship cargo bay. Or, even cooler, a Superheavy-launched expendable second stage.

      In conversation Saturday, 09-Dec-2023 19:38:08 JST permalink

Feeds

  • Activity Streams
  • RSS 2.0
  • Atom
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.