GNU social JP
  • FAQ
  • Login
GNU social JPは日本のGNU socialサーバーです。
Usage/ToS/admin/test/Pleroma FE
  • Public

    • Public
    • Network
    • Groups
    • Featured
    • Popular
    • People

Conversation

Notices

  1. Embed this notice
    David Hepworth (dhepworth@allthingstech.social)'s status on Thursday, 07-Dec-2023 00:20:24 JST David Hepworth David Hepworth
    • Thomas 🔭🕹️

    @thomasfuchs > “These design decisions go so far to severely hamper basic human discourse; namely the unreliable replies (people on different servers often see different replies) and not having quote posts.”

    It’s not a bug, it’s a feature?

    In conversation Thursday, 07-Dec-2023 00:20:24 JST from allthingstech.social permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Brion Vibber :blobcatcoffee:​ (brion@bikeshed.vibber.net)'s status on Thursday, 07-Dec-2023 00:26:46 JST Brion Vibber :blobcatcoffee:​ Brion Vibber :blobcatcoffee:​
      • Thomas 🔭🕹️

      @thomasfuchs tbf i don't think anyone deliberately designed the lack of consistency in replies to reduce conflict, i think that one's just lack of thinking the design through.

      In conversation Thursday, 07-Dec-2023 00:26:46 JST permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Brion Vibber :blobcatcoffee:​ (brion@bikeshed.vibber.net)'s status on Thursday, 07-Dec-2023 00:35:51 JST Brion Vibber :blobcatcoffee:​ Brion Vibber :blobcatcoffee:​
      in reply to
      • Thomas 🔭🕹️

      @thomasfuchs i'm also given to understand there are problems with blocked people being able to still post replies on your posts, something that wouldn't happen if replies were managed by your own server instead of just happening out in the ether

      In conversation Thursday, 07-Dec-2023 00:35:51 JST permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Brion Vibber :blobcatcoffee:​ (brion@bikeshed.vibber.net)'s status on Thursday, 07-Dec-2023 00:35:52 JST Brion Vibber :blobcatcoffee:​ Brion Vibber :blobcatcoffee:​
      in reply to
      • Thomas 🔭🕹️

      @thomasfuchs in a system that was concentrating on reducing conflict, this wouldn't happen -- because the lack of seeing each others' replies *creates* conflict as multiple people post the same "hot takes" over and over. you'd instead have replies for a post managed by a the server of the person who posted the parent post, so that moderators could actually moderate discussions

      none of that's in mastodon, where reply trees are applied via some activitypub reply chain at a separate level

      In conversation Thursday, 07-Dec-2023 00:35:52 JST permalink
    • Embed this notice
      John Conway (john@sauropods.win)'s status on Thursday, 07-Dec-2023 05:33:01 JST John Conway John Conway
      • Thomas 🔭🕹️

      @thomasfuchs is the replies thing a deliberate design decision? If so, that’s crazy. I thought it was a bug or at least accidental.

      In conversation Thursday, 07-Dec-2023 05:33:01 JST permalink

Feeds

  • Activity Streams
  • RSS 2.0
  • Atom
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.