"This turboretarded, extremely expensive, absolutely proprietary and wasteful AI that has huge potential to make the powers-that-be abuse the general public more easily than ever? Oh it's totally fine, I just wish more women, trannies and black people were involved, too many white men."
@explosionguy@jihadjimmy@meso her point is that if they had a single black person on their team they would have been sufficiently cautious to not allow that to be considered production-ready while it was still doing that.
@Moon@jihadjimmy@meso the "Google image classifier tagged black people are gorillas" issue seems overblown to me. It's a fuzzy tool that does not have fine recognition features or actual reasoning capabilities. A shaved chimpanzee and a human of any race actually look 90% the same from an objective image classifier perspective
@Moon@jihadjimmy@meso and the problem in my view is not lack of women and minorities, it's the fact that all the elites go to the same 4 colleges and have an attitude of proprietorship towards the 99%
@jihadjimmy@meso I think that when people talk about it they should not necessarily be in the industry since you're still affected by it even if you don't work on it. that was a big problem with all the us government talks, they mostly just invited people that were selling an AI product.
It doesn't matter if it's a guy, a gal, be black or white who speaks about it, this shit is bad regardless of who speaks about it, and if they're involved they're either: