@ryanhoulihan Some people do genuinely want to be offered revenge, though. It's not a solution, but it's something on offer that they want. I personally know people who just want to spite and hurt their imagined enemies.
@ryanhoulihan I wish there was a way to knock some sense into people, but at this point they are either too embarrassed to admit they've been gravely wrong about their political party, or are just too driven by hatred for anyone who isn't them to care, oblivious to the fact that empowering the people who hate the same people as them isn't going to gain them anything in the long run. They'll all be in the same boat as the rest of us and all we'll be able to say then is "I told you so".
@ryanhoulihan If you think having some base civility is tone policing and respectability politics, especially with someone who actually fundamentally agrees with you but wanted to make a minor distinction in two concepts along the way, then it's better if we don't talk.
@kandersonus@ryanhoulihan Appreciate the peacemaker position you're trying to be in here, but my initial response was perfectly reasonable and I don't deserve to be lashed out at.
Conservatives are good at seeing that there is *something wrong*, honestly better than most Neo-Liberals, but they draw the exact wrong conclusions and the worse solutions.
That's not even taking into account when they see something wrong and it's only wrong to them because they are bigoted.
Like, you try to explain the nuance of an issue and inevitably get hung up on how beating children more isn't going to fix the economy.
If "worked" means "inequality increased to record levels and to maintain their position, the wealthy waged campaigns via recently purchased media corps to get the public to blame immigrants, Black people, gays, trans, nurses, unions for their financial woes" then yes, totally worked.
@ryanhoulihan Nah, it's not an illusion. Putin's 17.4m #brexshitters voted to fuck up other people's lives and got exactly what they wanted. (So they are no doubt deliriously happy now.)
@Stoat@ryanhoulihan@jonoabroad lol, no. Inequality as a record-lows in the late 70s. IMO, that’s why interest rates were so high and stock prices were so low. Rich people provide investment capital. By the late 80s, inequality was in the sweet spot. Since then, it’s gone crazy.
@Stoat@jonoabroad@ryanhoulihan I’m a firm believer in progressive, regulated capitalism. Think the US in the 50s and 60s. BTW, the top tax rate back then was as high as 94%. We need that kind of rate today. The give-everything-to-the-rich bullshit we have now is unsustainable and fucking-up everything from the climate to housing to the media. What kind of system would you prefer?
@ryanhoulihan Well ... my theory is that haters just luuuurve hating. So if one target is dealt with they move on to the next one. That's what makes them "happy" - certainly nothing else does!!
@ryanhoulihan I know you said not to. But whole scientific studies should be done on the kinds of people the right appeals to. Because. They are the absolute most insecure human beings to ever walk the face of the earth.
Always with a chip on their shoulder like the world owes them something. And have basically chopped and screwed their own minds so much. They'd get 2+2= 4 wrong.
It makes them feel better about themselves because they have no other way to do so.
@ryanhoulihan Control of world resources are won with violence and cruelty. That's the game. Those not benefitting are brainwashed minions. Brainwashing is so embedded and pervasive, it's unseen.
@ryanhoulihan meh, to say that conservatism offers a conservative nothing would be to gaslight them with the liberal position.
a conservative could say the exact same thing about a liberal candidate offering nothing to liberals, it means absolutely nothing by itself because it's emotionally driven and not backed by any useful information.
if someone can think of even one reason to be a liberal or a conservative, then surely there's people out there who hold beliefs based on this reasoning.