Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   silverpill (silverpill@mitra.social)'s status on Friday, 20-Oct-2023 21:53:57 JST silverpill

   • Kye Fox :veripanda1:

   @Kye

   >why not just AT?

   Because it's not an open protocol? Technical features are not the only thing that makes protocol better or worse, what also matters is who drives the development and who controls the infrastructure. Today, ActivityPub is the only truly open social web protocol. There's no company behind it, no official app, and no associated cryptocurrency. It doesn't even have a single organization that dictates standards.

   BS, in comparison, is not much different from Twitter and Facebook. Sure, a company with a lot of money can win in a competition against the fediverse community, but I don't think it's a desirable outcome.

   Why not improve ActivityPub instead?

   • Embed this notice
     silverpill (silverpill@mitra.social)'s status on Thursday, 26-Oct-2023 10:24:05 JST silverpill

     in reply to

     • Kye Fox :veripanda1:
     • Damon

     @dameoutlaw @Kye

     An open protocol like ActivityPub is a public good. There's no entity that tries to "capture value", so it evolves according to the needs of users. When protocol is developed by a company, incentives are different. A similar thing happens when cryptocurrency is involved, because interests of coin holders are not aligned with interests of users.

     Association between Nostr and Bitcoin is weak, but it is nevertheless tainted by it, and in my view that makes it less open. I don't want to work with people hired by Jack Dorsey. Similarly, I don't want to work with deranged bitcoiners. People who are building Fediverse do it because they love it, not because somebody or something pays them, and that makes a big difference.

     I'm not sure what do you mean by cultural debt. Decentralized identity has always been a hot topic in Fediverse, and I don't think anyone would fight against good ideas. Technical debt exists but it is small, and it is not critical for those who want to build something different. One can go quite far without breaking federation with popular implementations like Mastodon, and if incompatible features are necessary, bridging is always an option.

     There is really no technical reason to create a competing protocol.

   • Embed this notice
     Damon (dameoutlaw@mstdn.social)'s status on Thursday, 26-Oct-2023 10:24:07 JST Damon

     in reply to

     • Kye Fox :veripanda1:

     @silverpill @Kye
     What does cryptocurrency have to do with being open? Is Nostr not open?
     There’s several reasons as to why not build on AP but I’ll narrow them down to two. Tech debt and cultural debt. Many people here are anti-capitalist & anti Dorsey. Out of their own principles they never would’ve adopted bsky implementation of AP. That team was hired & given millions. That would be a waste to develop something that many would have fought them on & not used anyways