Conversation
Notices
-
Embed this notice
FourOh-LLC (fouroh-llc@pkteerium.xyz)'s status on Wednesday, 27-Sep-2023 17:13:47 JST FourOh-LLC Being woke, being a Social Justice Warrior, being a "good person" is suffering beyond description, to conform to the perfect social creature you are not.
Society is placing unrealistic demands on you, and instead of rejecting it you are conforming. You are NOT changing society for the better - you are changing yourself for the worse.
Jesus taught you, told you to be aware of the money changers and the tax collectors. Their activities (not their person) enraged him. Likewise, it is not the discussion that changes society - it is the deceptive and criminal ACTIONS. Nobody is getting injured or die due to a debate. People get injured or die because de-criminalizing drug use, tolerating the ransacking of homes and businesses, and releasing illegals and criminals - who have little to none to lose - onto the streets.-
Embed this notice
NEETzsche (neetzsche@iddqd.social)'s status on Wednesday, 27-Sep-2023 17:13:46 JST NEETzsche Soon it will be those once law-abiding White people who have little to none to lose, and they will know that they were put in that position on account of their race.
-
Embed this notice
?? Humpleupagus ?? (humpleupagus@eveningzoo.club)'s status on Wednesday, 27-Sep-2023 17:29:10 JST ?? Humpleupagus ?? How long would the imperfect explosion take to expand or collapse? What's "time" look like within either of those events? How would you know that you're not in the midst of one of them? 🤔 -
Embed this notice
FourOh-LLC (fouroh-llc@pkteerium.xyz)'s status on Wednesday, 27-Sep-2023 17:29:11 JST FourOh-LLC I never identify with the ignorant and with their problems. The overwhelming majority of injury and suffering is self-inflicted.
The best I can do is warn people. Rationality, Logic, the scientific mind is not always the best advisor - as the matter of fact its destructive without a reflection, without a critic.
---
The other day I came across a very interesting discussion about how the Big Bang is no longer assumed to be the "beginning" of the Universe. It is still part of the process, but its no longer the origin.
The argument is really simple, easy to understand - that "infinitely hot and dense" singularity was perfectly balanced. Too little of one thing would have caused the Universe to collapse back on itself, and too much of it would have caused it to expand too quickly, without allowing matter the chance to coalesce.
My point it - sometimes you need to look at a scale and perspective that is beyond any Human comprehension, and submit to the Graceful condition of absolute Humility. -
Embed this notice
?? Humpleupagus ?? (humpleupagus@eveningzoo.club)'s status on Wednesday, 27-Sep-2023 17:50:26 JST ?? Humpleupagus ?? A very smart metaphysician once told me that the best part about mathematics, especially when it comes to creating cosmological models, is that if your model is figuratively falling down a cliff, you can just assume a rope.
I think it's a big assumption that because we are here that the big bang is balanced and that the law of physics as they now exist will always remain constant, and one that is nondiscomfirmable.
For all we know, the entire existence of the universe could be but a millisecond to an infinite God, and in that millisecond it was created and destroyed. -
Embed this notice
FourOh-LLC (fouroh-llc@pkteerium.xyz)'s status on Wednesday, 27-Sep-2023 17:50:27 JST FourOh-LLC Well, I brought his up as a personal reflection, and I am not an astrophysicist... but, the conclusion of the paper was that because of the "perfectly balanced primordial soup" the Big Bang was a success in creating an endlessly sustaining Universe, where atoms did manage to form.
I watched something on this subject, called "how the Universe will end", and the timeline is so ridiculously long that it is safe to call it "eternity".
-
Embed this notice