@LALegault@tillybridges@blogdiva Given the kind of solidarity we’ve seen, I expect WGA already have their eye on that ball. The device you describe only works if the union who settled is willing to ply along with being used as a lever against the other.
@blogdiva@LALegault@tillybridges I don’t know, it really does seem to me this can cut both ways. If WGA got major concessions on AI or streaming, actors will now be less likely to accept an agreement without similar concessions. (“Give us what they got!”) And studios still can’t resume production without both; actors have same leverage as before. I see it breaking down if (and only if) writers start pressuring actors to settle. But time may prove me wrong!
@LALegault@inthehands@blogdiva for fuck’s sake. The nyt is a transphobic shitshow and the WGA has leaked nothing, this is entirely made up or is part of studio propaganda, which they’ve been doing via Hollywood reporter, deadline, and variety all along.
you have zero idea what you’re talking about. and your uninformed opinions weren’t asked for. Spread your propaganda elsewhere.
and learn the goddamned meaning of stopping when someone tells you no
@inthehands@blogdiva@LALegault I don’t know how you’d have that info since the WGA negcom certainly didn’t leak it. as such, this just feels like fear mongering nonsense.