@basadeskaiser@Terry@BroDrillard don't liken up stalin to nato's shabbesgoyim, too many variables painted out stalin as a bloodthirsty warmonger, but the dude was full on for third reich cooperation, it was just thanks to anglos that the great war for the fatherland happened hating jews isn't strictly a natsoc thing
All these ideas that NATO and ukraine comes up with will be usable against NATO. Nothing prevents say Iran, the palestinians, the Chinese or whomever sending a swarm of these against US carriers.
@BroDrillard@Terry I mean a uke looking at a map while talking to radio or a drone pilot, literally 3 extra seconds would have explained the whole thing.
@PurpCat@Terry@basadeskaiser@BroDrillard the craziest part is that neither nazis nor soviets would've lost if they didn't attack russia based on fake intel from anglos that wilhelm canaris fed to hitler hitler really should've had a more tight grip on his subordinates, the abwehr organ was lead by a backstabbing snake, one that was blinded by ideology and romanticism and other dogshit
@basadeskaiser@Terry@PurpCat@BroDrillard think whatever you want, ultimately the soviets did more to purge jews than the third reich ever did, if we were to go by facts deport jewish refugees back to the third reich, then massacre a good chunk of the "intellectuals", most of them being either jews or jew-alligned, then cause a mass exodus of jews to israel, way after stalin's death
There were multiple cases of companies splitting who would have the same plants and names and technology but one was in the east and one wasn't because as it turns out the USA/west allying with a country that hated their economy and politics didn't work out.
@PurpCat@Terry@basadeskaiser@BroDrillard what'd you expect man, although at the time it wasn't USA funnily enough, it was britain, wilhelm canaris sold out to the brits, and the brits planted a faggot in poland to provoke germany into war however he could the anglos have been a cancer upon the world ever since they were the first to accept rothschilds
@basadeskaiser@Terry@PurpCat@BroDrillard western historians dismissed it because it painted anglos as warmongers that wanted war in the west for their own profit i'll dismiss it because stalin had no real reason to be hostile towards the third reich let's be real, why would stalin cooperate so much with the third reich, so far as to depart jewish refugees BACK to germany when their came to ussr for refuge, if he wanted to conquer europe, some sort of 4d chess play? only /pol/ retards believe in 4d chess
>Icebreaker: Who Started the Second World War? (Russian title: Ledokol, Ледокол) is a military history book by the Russian non-fiction author Viktor Suvorov, published in 1988.[1] Suvorov argued that Joseph Stalin planned a conquest of Europe for many years, and was preparing to launch a surprise attack on Nazi Germany at the end of summer of 1941 to begin that plan. He says that Operation Barbarossa was a pre-emptive strike by Adolf Hitler, a claim which the Nazi leader himself had made at the time.
@basadeskaiser@Terry@PurpCat@BroDrillard with how much bullshit is there about that war i'm inclined to believe germans were victims of british lies, canaris sold out to brits and fed hitler bullshit about the soviets wanting to attack even though they had zero benefit from a war with the third reich
@lina@Terry@PurpCat@BroDrillard neither Stalin nor Hitler were as hostile towards jews are they are painted as nowadays. I believe is mostly trostkfags painting (((le new world narrative))). Hitler stated his reasons for the attack.