It has been fashionable to bury GNU and all other OS's by referring to GNU/Linux, BusyBox/Linux and systemd/Linux after the name of a kernel because NPCs are obsessed with popular, short, buzzwordy names (even if a shorter, better buzzword would be correct to use) and there's a proprietary agenda to ensure that people never hear of GNU and why it was written.
A similarity would be like if people took to calling yellow; "green", even when provided hard evidence that the colours that compose up the so called "green" are in fact a combination of red and green.
A Linux distribution would be a distribution of Linux, so either the proprietary version from kernel.org, or GNU Linux-libre for example.
@mischievoustomato Linux is like the transmission of the car - it's required, but mostly irrelevant as you can swap out the transmission with another one unless you want to use a limited set of specific transmission features.
Testing with Debian GNU/Hurd confirmed that most software doesn't care what kernel you use, as most free software in the Debian tree just worked after being compiled against Hurd's glibc.
@Suiseiseki the most important part of the system is the kernel itself, the coreutils fsftards try so hard to sell to try to make people call it "gnu/linux🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓" are meaningless in the grand scheme of things. GNU does not matter.
Yes, you and most people will continue to use buzzwords incorrectly to the benefit of proprietary software companies and will never see the error of their ways until it's far too late.
>sell it like its the best thing ever Linux certainly isn't the best thing ever, as it's proprietary malware.
GNU is the only non-toy 100% free software OS, which makes it the best OS automatically, as what good is an OS if it doesn't respect the users freedom?
>it's a russian roulette What are you on about?
The whole idea of Russian roulette was that it was a suicide technique where you have a 5/6 chance of dying, although the 1/6 chance variant has recently become more popular.
It's not comparable as you won't die from using GNU and I've found it to be a hell of a lot more reliable and easier to fix than windows even.
>i regret not getting a macbook Who would have thought?
Those macbooks used to come with GNU software, but not Linux (they now come with functionally inferior software that were only used because the licenses such were under doesn't ensure that the users freedom is respected).
@gray the evangelists sell it like its the best thing ever then you use it and it's a russian roulette. after more than 3 years of using it i regret not getting a macbook, honestly