They want a sea wall to protect their clifftop mansions from sea erosion.
They want that wall to be vertical, to preserve as much of their privately-owned beaches as possible.
But they also don't want the sea wall that protects their mansions to be ugly, like the one in Collaroy, because they're NIMBYs who want to maximise their property prices.
Despite not wanting a price on carbon, they want either the local or state government to build and maintain the beautiful vertical seawall on their private land that protects their clifftop mansions and their private beaches from erosion.
But the local council and the state government aren't paying, and they refuse to pay for it themselves.
So instead of building a beautiful seawall, or even a functional seawall like Collaroy, they're letting their mansions slowly fall into the sea.
@kcarruthers@ajsadauskas Nobody in their right mind is going to buy their mansions anyway, so why bother to build a seawall? Even that will have a limited life and need constant expensive maintenance.
@RHW@kcarruthers@ajsadauskas You’ve seen the Sydney real estate market, right? There are many many people “not in their right mind” buying the most ludicrous properties…
I am genuinely sorry if families are losing their only home & it will be a terrible financial loss. But truly, soil erosion on coastal property has been apparent for at least last fifty years. The climate change accelerated it drastically, but why did they not consider it in first place?