Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   Ross Grady (rossgrady@dood.net)'s status on Monday, 07-Aug-2023 04:07:31 JST Ross Grady

   • Thomas 🔭🕹️
   @thomasfuchs I felt like Jamie's point, which probably makes perfect sense from his POV (commenters coattailing on the "reach" of the OP) really *only* makes sense if you have a shitload of followers. Maybe such ppl need a different AP platform that figures out how to give them additional controls within the parameters of the protocol.
   • Thomas 🔭🕹️ and Gianni Rosato repeated this.
   • Embed this notice
     Moto :rainbowinfinity: (cmdrmoto@hachyderm.io)'s status on Monday, 07-Aug-2023 04:17:22 JST Moto :rainbowinfinity:

     in reply to

     • Thomas 🔭🕹️

     @rossgrady @thomasfuchs Coattailing here: I have noticed that the belief “I should have control over how people interact with what I’ve said in a Public Space” seems strongly correlated with Privilege.

     If you’ve got Capital, you might be accustomed to having the option of *buying* this (one-way, non-consensual communication) privilege: you can advertise, or buy a media company, or whatever.

     Poors, OTOH, are accustomed to having zero control over The Narrative.

   • Embed this notice
     Jan Lehnardt :couchdb: (janl@narrativ.es)'s status on Monday, 07-Aug-2023 04:21:55 JST Jan Lehnardt :couchdb:

     • Thomas 🔭🕹️

     @thomasfuchs love the idea that somehow there is no abuse in comments from people who have been on the internet since before there was the web.