@davidrevoy C'est extraordinaire !!! Vraiment incroyable de voir ça ; et les couleurs !!! :neko_star_eyes: :neko_star_eyes: :neko_star_eyes: J'aime beaucoup trop !!!
@hj Yes ☺️ I'm trying to adapt her to my style. Cool character design, but I'll probably skip the print on her kimono with the big Plemora logo so it looks less than a promo shirt on the illustration. On a painterly artwork, it will probably look more artistic.
@pipivovott ☺️ Yes. Lovely design, I had references on my disk and it was on a to-do "maybe someday" for a very long time. I hope I'll do her design justice painted in my style.
@puniko True ? I wanted to contrast a bit with the Plemora Tan as often depicted: Kawaï and with cute pose (eg. doing the V with her finger). I wanted mine to be a strong feminine figure with a lot of confidence in her eyes. That's often a theme I like to paint. ?
@davidrevoy it already looks amazing, i can't wait for the finished piece!! i adore your art style and your works, so when i saw that you started painting her i've actually screamed IRL :niceembarrassed:
hair accessory differs between who you're asking - very very old (and lost to time) original artwork used :joulutorttu: (finnish christmas pastry) but people complained it looked like something offensive, some people substitute it with a paper windmill, but most popular option seems to be nondescript swirly thing... personally i prefer :joulutorttu: because it's tasty. image.png f1f4d39ec617136e4dc134d9304e2fa…
@hj@davidrevoy@vyivel@pipivovott@Moon No, the license is properly handled I believe, see the COPYING file! Pleroma-tan images are CC-BY-SA-4.0 to shitposter.club, as far as it seems, and the shy one is CC-BY-4.0.
@davidrevoy@vyivel@pipivovott honestly, I don't really know. We were never organized enough to care about licenses and such, and our... founder is MIA. I guess you can attribute to pleroma.social. Maybe @Moon can say better IIRC he commissioned THE first pleroma-tan.
Thanks for the links and good job pipivovott on the recent artworks.
I put a dried flower in her hair, but it's on the defocus side of the portrait, so it suggests something pointy and pale yellowish but it is not clearly identifiable. (I love the aesthetic of dried plants, a sort of "autumn nature gothic" vibes in them ?).
By the way, for the license I know Pleroma Tan is under CC-By-Sa, but what is the content of the original attribution? "pleroma.social" ?
By the way, do you know what's best for a title "Pleroma Tan" or "Pleroma-Tan" (or small case all)? I read last 24h almost all the way of writing it and I'm a bit lost now ?
@davidrevoy@MoeBritannica -tan is like the -chan suffix (in Japanese), I'd say it's like an integral part of it? ? It's mostly used to mean "mascot", here, like for Wikipe-tan!
@helene@davidrevoy@vyivel@pipivovott@hj no attribution is needed for original drawings of pleroma-tan, just if that original image was copied or modified directly would i ask for attribution.
@helene@vyivel@pipivovott@hj@Moon Thanks! Mmm... If the original is CC-BY-SA-4.0 "shitposter.club" , then it's recursive and the derivation of the shy one has to be also CC-BY-SA-4.0. It can't be more open under CC-By-4.0 (just saying).
Too bad the attribution contains the word "shit", that might deboost a lot my art on other social media when I'll have to attribute.
@davidrevoy@pipivovott@hj@Moon Doesn't that apply if you modify the original image or redistribute it? ? Nevertheless, Moon has the saying in the license, I think; many people abbreviate his instance name to SPC, you might prefer that :nkoThink:
@helene@davidrevoy@hj@pipivovott@vyivel hey helene can you copy the previous message to him that he doesn't need to attribute us? I think oour servers may not talk.
Now it's clear. I'll post mine as "CC-BY-SA-4.0 David Revoy, pleroma.social" , so I'll keep the spirit of the Libre license, point to the project, and avoid the 'shit' word ? If you agree and like it, feel free to advise the same practise for future authors on https://git.pleroma.social/pleroma/pleroma/-/blob/develop/COPYING