It isn't to say that any of the interviewers that get these accusations aren't bigots either, as I'm certain all who've been doing this for over a week, have made bigoted remarks during said time. Racist, sexist, ableist, ageist & antireligious minority are probably the most common categories so -- comb through a month of any of your favorites, as I'm tired of this nonsense--- especially from those who want me to take elections as a process seriously! If we didn't have so much rigging then this would be among my top 10 reasons for not taking such contests seriously... because said silliness shows others don't!
Conversation
Notices
-
Embed this notice
Allium planter (brahmabelarusian@todon.eu)'s status on Saturday, 08-Jul-2023 01:12:44 JST Allium planter -
Embed this notice
Allium planter (brahmabelarusian@todon.eu)'s status on Saturday, 08-Jul-2023 01:12:46 JST Allium planter I've yet to see a political figure without enough real & direct things they'd done or said that were wrong to at least seem warranted to want them barred from trust &/or elected office -- including relatively good ones like the late Mike Gravel -- so I really don't have any like of seeing the nonsensical "if this candidate did an interview with someone who by my standards has bigoted opinions & gives them a courtesy verbal thanks at the end it, then the candidate is that type of bigot" argument set.
* This isn't an endorsement of any person, as so far I'm still pretty solidly set with Cthulhu.
AnthonyJK-Admin repeated this.
-
Embed this notice