Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   feld (feld@bikeshed.party)'s status on Saturday, 01-Jul-2023 05:15:05 JST feld
   It's not an automatic lie, the user has to press a button to request it. Please correct this erroneous bug report
   • Embed this notice
     feld (feld@bikeshed.party)'s status on Saturday, 01-Jul-2023 07:26:03 JST feld

     in reply to

     • j.r / Julian
     An LLM can absolutely satisfy this goal. You will be proven wrong.
   • Embed this notice
     j.r / Julian (jr@social.anoxinon.de)'s status on Saturday, 01-Jul-2023 07:26:04 JST j.r / Julian

     in reply to

     @feld @eevee WTF? If the user clicks the "explain" button, they would/should expect a correct explanation of what they see, but a LLM based "AI" will never satisfy this goal

   • Embed this notice
     feld (feld@bikeshed.party)'s status on Saturday, 01-Jul-2023 07:44:46 JST feld

     in reply to

     • j.r / Julian
     And it will be augmented to do so much more
   • Embed this notice
     j.r / Julian (jr@social.anoxinon.de)'s status on Saturday, 01-Jul-2023 07:44:47 JST j.r / Julian

     in reply to

     @feld @eevee a LLM is not made to give you factually correct answers, it is only designed to generate answers that seem plausible because it's linguistically correct...

   • Embed this notice
     feld (feld@bikeshed.party)'s status on Saturday, 01-Jul-2023 07:45:17 JST feld

     in reply to

     • j.r / Julian
     • Wouter Verhelst
     It won't be an LLM alone
   • Embed this notice
     Wouter Verhelst (wouter@pleroma.debian.social)'s status on Saturday, 01-Jul-2023 07:45:25 JST Wouter Verhelst

     in reply to

     • j.r / Julian
     @feld
     @eevee @jr
     
     Only in the 'million monkeys with typewriter' sense. Yes, eventually there will be something that, by pure chance, ends up being correct.
     
     But an LLM is just advanced statistics. It makes plausible-sounding lies, by definition.