Does ever feel like theres a whole separate set of rules for police officers? There is. It’s not even just some subtle, emergent cultural effect. NYPD has an unsanctioned system of “get out of traffic violations for free” cards they hand out to their families and friends. They actually have a system of •physical• “rules don’t apply” cards. Think about the kind of impunity they must feel. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/jun/04/nypd-lawsuit-courtesy-cards-traffic-tickets
This is one of several reasons I’ve done a complete 180 on camera-based traffic regulation. I used to think cameras were creepy, and somehow a gateway to a police state. I was wrong. The system we live under now is worse. Cameras don’t randomly beat and murder people. Camera records can allow auditing for bias in who gets off the hook. And cameras don’t care about your stupid little laminated my-police-buddy-said-rules-don’t-apply-to-me card.
@inthehands But it doesn't have to be either-or. You can do much better than automated cops with technological measures. For example, instead of speeding ticket robot, you can have a light that turns red unless it senses a car going appropriate speed (some places have this!)
@inthehands I feel mixed about some of the implementations. Police have a tendency to turn body cameras *off*, for instance, and courts tend to let them get away with it.
@kiwi Yeah, there’s no system that can’t be made to be racist within a racist power structure.
But again, traffic cameras don’t murder people. Frequency of police-citizen interactions correlates directly with murders committed by police. In a racist system, traffic cameras can be an effective mitigation.
@kiwi Shotspotter is a whole other problem, and does not belong in the same bucket as traffic cameras. It doesn’t have an upside. It just generates bad data that justifies bad decisions. It’s a way of cooking the books to justify violent policing. I had several rants about it back on the hellsite, and might resurrect one here at some point.
@meelar@kiwi …and it’s difficult for me to imagine how it doesn’t become incredibly racist too. But I am always interested in hearing options. We should always be considering alternatives to our current system.
@dalias I like this kind of nonpunitive approach very much. This particular one only works at low traffic intersections unfortunately, but I’m really happy that people are thinking along these lines.
@inthehands I'm just making the argument that justifying the cost of technology implementation/these contracts with private surveillance companies drives city decisionmakers' behavior in fucked up ways; it's a mistake to assume any tech is being operated neutrally because revenue or budget line items or jobs or power is always on the line https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2008/04/red-light-camera-monkey-business-may-be-a-national-trend/
@kiwi No disagreement there. Again, our power structures guarantee that anything they create is going to be pretty fucked up.
I’m making a fairly narrow argument: (1) traffic cameras reduce the extent to which murder is a direct result of racist policing (even though policing is still racist), and (2) they open the door a crack wider to potential oversight (even if they don’t guarantee it).
@inthehands I knew someone who got pulled over by a cop. Good chance that they were actually over the limit or something, they were like that. At some point the cops demeanour changed to a much nicer one and they let them go. They were confused. When they got home they realised that on the back seat was a bag their mum had given them. Their mum was a prosecutor and the bag was branded as though it was a professional bag for staff of the prosecutors office (which it probably was).
@atthenius@inthehands "We can't possibly know if this state policy is as racist as it looks on its face" is not the gotcha you think it is: you're baking apologia for the state violence of displacement and environmental racism into your response rather than seeking to actually confront it. In any case this is a particularly hilarious derailment attempt to be reading here in DC, where we literally collect $0 from commuters for their moving violations, so we *know* the entire financial burden falls on folks in the neighborhood:
Communities of color tend to have more roadways and more VMT from (wealthier, non minority) folks passing through (vast AQ EJ lit). Thus, it is not surprising that majority minority neighborhoods would have more red light tickets issued. But it is unclear the demographics of the person receiving the ticket.
Did propublica get the zip codes / demographics folks being ticketed, or those where the ticket was issued? Latter is simple to get, former not so easy.