@thomasfuchs@JoshKagan Portable (export/import) history would be nice but it would be such a huge deal for instances having to deal with that.
I see some folks who simply treat their Mastodon posts as a more volatile and ephemeral media, and use their blogs for anything that should be more perennial. Not a bad strategy. But it’s a whole different philosophy.
@thomasfuchs fascinating! And I take your point and you’re probably right!
There are most likely a few of these “centralising forces” lying around pulling people into mastodon.social, and not without good reason right? Without post mobility, why not optimise for longevity!
Another force I imagine is maximising reach and minimising defed drama.
Whether you dislike a centralised fediverse, it’s important I think to recognise they emerge from its structure and dynamics.
@thomasfuchs Migration, like much of the current Mastodon landscape, is imperfect, but still better than existing alternatives... it does at least work (sans some things like post history). I migrated from mas.to to mastodon.acm.org just to see for myself and also try to encourage more visibility by different groups, though it's a bit quiet here, unfortunately. But my post history isn't all that valuable. I remain hopeful that issue will be better solved at some point in the future.
@thomasfuchs my favorite instance would be one that charges a mandatory and reasonable monthly fee for access resulting in a sustainable (and non-creepy) business model.