Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   ?Cirnog? (cirnog@poa.st)'s status on Wednesday, 07-Sep-2022 23:01:03 JST ?Cirnog?

   • touch fluffy tail
   • elftummy?:confederateflag:???????????
   @fluffy Explain yourself @elftummy
   • Embed this notice
     touch fluffy tail (fluffy@social.handholding.io)'s status on Wednesday, 07-Sep-2022 23:00:57 JST touch fluffy tail

     in reply to

     • elftummy?:confederateflag:???????????
     • FatOniAppreciator ?
     is she going to eat three slices of bread and also a shiskabob
   • Embed this notice
     elftummy?:confederateflag:??????????? (elftummy@poa.st)'s status on Wednesday, 07-Sep-2022 23:01:02 JST elftummy?:confederateflag:???????????

     in reply to

     • touch fluffy tail
     @cirnog @fluffy
     Explain what?
     Are you asking me to refute these?
   • Embed this notice
     FatOniAppreciator ? (daveholland@poa.st)'s status on Wednesday, 07-Sep-2022 23:01:02 JST FatOniAppreciator ?

     in reply to

     • touch fluffy tail
     • elftummy?:confederateflag:???????????
     @elftummy @cirnog @fluffy You only need one counter argument: the S Q U I S H
   • Embed this notice
     touch fluffy tail (fluffy@social.handholding.io)'s status on Thursday, 08-Sep-2022 00:04:40 JST touch fluffy tail

     in reply to

     • elftummy?:confederateflag:???????????
     • ?uper?nekFriend ?
     thiccccc tails :comfyeyes:
   • Embed this notice
     ?uper?nekFriend ? (supersnekfriend@poa.st)'s status on Thursday, 08-Sep-2022 00:04:41 JST ?uper?nekFriend ?

     in reply to

     • touch fluffy tail
     • elftummy?:confederateflag:???????????
     @elftummy @cirnog @fluffy Imagine believing that being properly and perfectly plump magically makes you unattractive, a bad wife, or a bad mother. :smug10:
     
     Also, bonus plump goth fluffy tail for you Fluffy. :02_blush:
   • Embed this notice
     elftummy?:confederateflag:??????????? (elftummy@poa.st)'s status on Thursday, 08-Sep-2022 00:04:42 JST elftummy?:confederateflag:???????????

     in reply to

     • touch fluffy tail
     • elftummy?:confederateflag:???????????
     @cirnog @fluffy 1
     >subjective, doesn't define "whole package" that all men apparently look for
     2
     >objectively incorrect, looking like you're capable of having children is the best and most feminine
     3
     >subjective, if you're focused on sound when having sex you haven't had sex &/or you're autistic (in a bad way)
     4
     >objectively incorrect, pierce brosnan is a good example. This chart was written by someone of low-class or no-class
     5
     >technically correct but in his explanation he makes serious errors saying that "healty" 40-y/o women are attractive :vomit: see point 2 about having kids
     6
     >lol make more money, poorfag - also unless you're actively trying to increase her weight it doesn't have to be expensive. I know this from experience
     7
     >This is the only real serious critique but it is easily remedied if you raise your kids right. If they're your kids then she shouldn't be the only one raising them, stupid
     8
     >this contradicts his 5th point where he says 40-y/o boomers look good.
     9
     >he doesn't even try to argue for this one he even says "probably" in the title. lmao.
     10
     >again he makes assumptions without ever having had sex, let alone dated women.
     
     tl;dr the creator of this chart is probably one of those "meninist" niggers (or whatever they're called) from the early 2010s who has little-or-no experience with real women; he's even got a man tipping a fedora in the chart title