GNU social JP
  • FAQ
  • Login
GNU social JPは日本のGNU socialサーバーです。
Usage/ToS/admin/test/Pleroma FE
  • Public

    • Public
    • Network
    • Groups
    • Featured
    • Popular
    • People

Conversation

Notices

  1. Embed this notice
    Chris Trottier (atomicpoet@mastodon.social)'s status on Wednesday, 03-May-2023 06:46:49 JST Chris Trottier Chris Trottier
    • Fediverse News

    This is so true.

    Once Twitter’s Blue Check became attainable to everyone, suddenly the “legacy” Blue Checks didn’t want it.

    So much about social media is about clout.

    The reason the old Twitter influencers don’t like Mastodon is because they have to build their clout from scratch.

    Meanwhile, Bluesky is rolling out the red carpet to them.

    Personally, I don’t like clout chasers. But that’s me.

    https://beige.party/@mentallyalex/110301245950084900

    @fediversenews

    In conversation Wednesday, 03-May-2023 06:46:49 JST from mastodon.social permalink

    Attachments


    1. https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/110/301/268/535/299/480/original/2e5887a6263859b3.jpeg
    2. No result found on File_thumbnail lookup.
      Alex (@mentallyalex@beige.party)
      from Alex
      @CarolynStirling@mastodon.nz It works well. If you only allow celebrities, certain classes of journalist, etc. onto the platform as creators and the 'regular people' to consume until you're 'stable enough for capacity testing' you build in a group that has a head start. Worked for Gmail, Facebook, etc. People enjoy feeling exclusive, look at how quickly they moved away from the checkmark once it was obtainable by 'regular' people. @atomicpoet@mastodon.social @fediversenews@venera.social
    • Embed this notice
      InfiniteOne (humanityexists@mastodon.social)'s status on Wednesday, 03-May-2023 06:52:26 JST InfiniteOne InfiniteOne
      in reply to
      • Fediverse News

      @atomicpoet @fediversenews Agreed.

      In conversation Wednesday, 03-May-2023 06:52:26 JST permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Chris Broome (cbroome@mastodon.social)'s status on Wednesday, 03-May-2023 06:57:29 JST Chris Broome Chris Broome
      in reply to
      • Fediverse News

      @atomicpoet @fediversenews I have a lot of sympathy for true celebrities and “notable” people. They’re constant targets for harassment, identity theft, and impersonation. Twitter’s blue checks were a very elegant solution to that problem. If Mastodon wants to court and maintain those people something similar is needed.

      In conversation Wednesday, 03-May-2023 06:57:29 JST permalink
    • Embed this notice
      ekana (ekana@mastodon.social)'s status on Wednesday, 03-May-2023 07:02:50 JST ekana ekana
      in reply to
      • Fediverse News

      @atomicpoet @fediversenews I think this is a fundamental misunderstanding why checkmarked people disliked the Twitter Blue check.

      In conversation Wednesday, 03-May-2023 07:02:50 JST permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Chris Trottier (atomicpoet@mastodon.social)'s status on Wednesday, 03-May-2023 07:03:04 JST Chris Trottier Chris Trottier
      in reply to
      • Andrés Monroy-Hernández

      @andresmh That’s been an idea for awhile. My thought is that celebrities should just start their own servers hosted on their own domain.

      In conversation Wednesday, 03-May-2023 07:03:04 JST permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Andrés Monroy-Hernández (andresmh@hci.social)'s status on Wednesday, 03-May-2023 07:03:05 JST Andrés Monroy-Hernández Andrés Monroy-Hernández
      in reply to

      @atomicpoet counter idea: a Mastodon instance only for “notable people.” As long as the people are not notable for their toxicity, it would boost the Fediverse’s visibility and benefit those who miss following them on here.

      In conversation Wednesday, 03-May-2023 07:03:05 JST permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Chris Trottier (atomicpoet@mastodon.social)'s status on Wednesday, 03-May-2023 07:04:39 JST Chris Trottier Chris Trottier
      in reply to
      • Fediverse News
      • Chris Broome

      @cbroome @fediversenews Something already exists: green checks. And you can also host your own server with your own domain.

      In conversation Wednesday, 03-May-2023 07:04:39 JST permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Chris Broome (cbroome@mastodon.social)'s status on Wednesday, 03-May-2023 07:10:17 JST Chris Broome Chris Broome
      in reply to
      • Fediverse News

      @atomicpoet @fediversenews Green checks are a start, and good for say news orgs that have trusted public sites, but it’s certainly not foolproof

      In conversation Wednesday, 03-May-2023 07:10:17 JST permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Chris Trottier (atomicpoet@mastodon.social)'s status on Thursday, 04-May-2023 07:48:57 JST Chris Trottier Chris Trottier
      in reply to
      • Luke Kanies
      • Fediverse News

      @lkanies @fediversenews Blue Checks were never entirely about verification. If that were the case, the service would be available to everyone. Notability is what made you qualified for a blue check, which is tied to status and clout.

      On the other hand, account verification is available to everyone who uses Mastodon.

      In conversation Thursday, 04-May-2023 07:48:57 JST permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Luke Kanies (lkanies@hachyderm.io)'s status on Thursday, 04-May-2023 07:48:58 JST Luke Kanies Luke Kanies
      in reply to
      • Fediverse News

      @atomicpoet @fediversenews as a former holder of a legacy blue check mark (I wrote key software twitter used in infrastructure)…

      I think you are doing them quite a disservice. I would never give Musk money for twitter. And the blue check mark now means absolutely nothing other than you pay.

      If it were just a means of confirming you are who you say you are, then many would have stuck with it.

      But there’s zero actual verification now. So you can and do have impersonators with check marks

      In conversation Thursday, 04-May-2023 07:48:58 JST permalink

Feeds

  • Activity Streams
  • RSS 2.0
  • Atom
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.