@realcaseyrollins@Fu Issues with Catholic doctrines: * Salvation is faith plus works (Council of Trent) * Immaculate conception of Mary * That Mary is co-redemptix and mediatrix with Christ * Mary remaining a virgin, claiming the brothers of Jesus are actually cousins * The whole idea there’s this store house of good works, filled by those who have been sainted. You won’t find any of this the Bible. Most Catholics don’t even know their own doctrine.
The idea of "the Bible alone", called Sola scriptura in theological terms, didn't even exist prior to the 14th century, and had near 0 influence on Christians until the 16th century.
@realcaseyrollins what do you mean by "God gave us in the scriptures"? Christ Jesus founded the Catholic Church and gave us Tradition, of which the Bible is part of. Your description sounds as if the Bible where some magic book discovered to teach all truths, like the LDS believes of The Book of Mormon.
The New Testament didn’t exist until the pope declared it as such in the 4th century.
What? Like, as books? The books were gradually written over thousands of years, they weren’t given to us by Catholicism.
Also, I find it strange that you think 2 Thessalonians 2:15 mandates adding to Scripture, as it doesn’t seem like that’s what’s explicitly being encouraged here. Can you explain why you think this passage condones the addition of new rules to what God has given us in the Scriptures? Was what God gave us not good enough, that we have to make stuff up in order for our salvation to be complete?
@Fu@realcaseyrollins not trolling. The New Testament didn't exist until the pope declared it as such in the 4th century. Regarding the Bible alone being unbiblical "Therefore, brothers, stand firm and hold fast to the traditions that you were taught, either by an oral statement or by a letter of ours." 2 Thessalonians 2:15 NABRE bible.com/bible/463/2th.2.15.N…
@realcaseyrollins Catholics gave us the Bible. It is only one part of sacred tradition. To treat Christianity as "the Bible alone" it is not only anti-history, but it's anti-biblical.
@Fu You're right to some extent, although it can't be denied that #Catholic dogma adds things to Scripture that weren't there to begin with, and they were certainly analogous to the Pharisees at one point.
Their addition of new objects of veneration, unforgivable sins, etc. leads to a somewhat different Gospel than what you'll see in most #Christian denominations.
@realcaseyrollins wrong as usual ;-) #Christian dogma is all based on #Catholic#Traditition. #Protestants, particularly the #baptists#evangelicals and so-called non-denominational Christians, have just watered down Christian thelogoy to make it more pallitable. Regardless all of those Christians have a lot to offer the faith. For the most part Catholics have as much to learn from Evangelicals as vice versa. Learn from all. If you seek the truth, the #chruch will show up
I’m trying out some #Christian webcasts/podcasts, and rn I’m listening to #WretchedRadio and the #Wretched podcast (still not sure what the difference is) and #JamesWhite’s #ApologiaMinistries podcast. Do y’all have some recommendations of some other broadcasters who are in a similar vein?
@realcaseyrollins I'm not that into podcasts these days, but there's a few faith based ones i still have on my list, a Nuns life, Two Drunk ex-pastors, Catholic Women Preach, More2Life, Belivers Voice of Victory, Catholic Answers Live (I'm guessing this would be like your apologetics one) Everday Liminality (i think you might like this one as its Francisicans discussing movies, TV and other pop culture, no its not just "its all the devil"
@jordonr@Fu Yes and this is what I was getting at. Those verses Fu cited said to follow traditions. Okay, fine, but which traditions? Any of them? Whose traditions? How many? At what time?
Paul would not have told Believers that they need to bind themselves to extrabiblical dictates.
@realcaseyrollins@jordonr@Fu The traditions of the Church not of man. Starting with St. Peter, the first bishop of Rome and continuing with the magestetium of today, head by the current Bishop of Rome, Francis I
@realcaseyrollins@jordonr@Fu I am not adding anything. You are correct salvation is a gift from Christ via his works and those of his Church. We are saved by his grace, not by a single choice of ours. Pi isn't in the Bible, is it not truth? Trinity is not in the Bible. Is it not true? Sunday sabbath isn't in the bible. Having a personal relationship with Jesus isn't in the bible. Ohm law isn't in the bible.
@fu@libranet.de@realcaseyrollins@Fu@hostux.social The word Trinity isn’t, but the concept is in the Bible, when Jesus was baptized, we have God the Father, God the Son (Jesus), and the Holy Spirit. Sunday worship is in the Bible, Acts 20:7, breaking bread aka communion/Lord’s Supper. Personal relationship with Christ: John 15, 1 John 4 and 5. Comparing truths in natural law to man made tradition is not the same in the slightest. Please read God’s word, the Bible.
@jordonr@otso 2,000 years of Catholic tradition makes it easy to call out heritical teachings like Unitarianism,but with the bible alone, everything is open to dome yagoos interruptions of translation.
@otso@fellowship Then who is Jesus? Why did it matter he died on the Cross? And if he wasn’t God, how could he forgive sins? The early church does not agree with your interpretation. “He says not ‘Our Father’: in one sense therefore, He is mine, in another sense He is yours; by nature mine, by grace yours... my God, under whom I also am as a man; your God, between whom and you I am a mediator.” - Augustine
“there is but one God, the Father, from whom all things came and for whom we live; and there is but one Lord, Jesus Christ, through whom all things came and through whom we live.” (1 Corinthians 8:6)