This is really interesting! I know I say that a lot, but in this case it's very true. It seems like a lot of people are OK with developers building search engines that meet current community standards.
When I originally designed the permission system in ActivityPub, I expected to have activities addressed to the Public be available for typical Web use: reading and linking.
I also think republication should be based on licensing, like Creative Commons licenses. Not very well supported now on the fediverse, unfortunately.
People seem to forget who have come to the fediverse from Twitter is that those platforms have republication terms built into their terms of use. Not the case here!
We have 30 years of weird precedent in Web search, like Google, that's found an uneasy and dynamic balance that seems to appease all sides.
Search is a powerful counterbalance to centralisation.
Being able to use N many different search engines to find references to a hashtag means you don't have to default to a single supernode's use of that hashtag.
My polls are neither binding resolutions nor scientific instruments.
I do polls almost every day, on a lot of topics. I do it because I'm interested in people's thoughts and opinions. I try to write them clearly and succinctly, but that's basically to minimise having to clarify over and over.
"Most people" here means "most people who responded".
@evan You do know that this is in no way a representative sample or valid survey right? Most normal users probably don’t understand what “according to current standards” (limited) means.
@evan speaking of decentralization, I think a federated search, where each instance keeps its own index of its own content and the searcher can request results from many instances, could easily address my concerns about search and probably most others concerns, too
@evan no man, that's the attitude that's so frustrating about the previous search imolementors. Building something that conforms to community norms requires communication*before* you build.
We should be telling people, "if you think that, then spread the idea around and see what others think. See if you can find a group of people to help guide you"
@evan I think as long as the platform makes it possible to build bad tools, they’re going to get built. I’m still pretty new here, but I think we need to figure out how to evolve the platform so we aren’t dependent on good intentions.