Untitled attachment

Notices where this attachment appears

1. Embed this notice
   Michał "rysiek" Woźniak · 🇺🇦 (rysiek@mstdn.social)'s status on Tuesday, 08-Apr-2025 21:53:44 JST Michał "rysiek" Woźniak · 🇺🇦

   in reply to

   Oh and by the way, it's always the No JS Day on my bloggo as well.

   Once I re-enable CSS in a day or two, I invite you to click around and explore. Plenty of interactivity is possible with no JS at all.

   In fact, these two little side-projects of mine are pretty darn interactive, and use zero lines of JavaScript:

   (CW Donald Trump, but funny)
   https://rys.io/you-are-donald-trump/

   (CW map of Russian invasion of Ukraine)
   https://projects.rys.io/ukrainvasion/

   #WebDev

2. Embed this notice
   Laffy (gottalaff@mstdn.social)'s status on Saturday, 01-Mar-2025 06:02:43 JST Laffy

   in reply to

   @nitpicking No, that's now what @Wileymiller or I did at all.

   In fact, I said he was politically savvy. But he's also exactly as his own Cabinet members said in 2020: A moron. He's stupid. We don't give him credit for being "smart." And if you ever read my feed, I've always said we shouldn't underestimate him. He's still a moron. Clear now #ReplyGuy?

   @Salty

   cc: @Snowshadow Maybe you could say it better. I'm done here.

3. Embed this notice
   The Seven Voyages Of Steve (sinbad@mastodon.gamedev.place)'s status on Thursday, 09-Jan-2025 02:41:33 JST The Seven Voyages Of Steve

   Man, figuring out how to manually position particles in Niagara was a huge PITA. Docs mention Niagara Data Channels and Niagara Data Interfaces but so much of it is out of date and / or incomplete it's kinda *worse* than it not being there at all.

   In the end I discovered I could do it just with user array parameters indexed with particle IDs, which *become* data interfaces, something never mentioned in the docs so making the connection was extremely hard. I feel a blog post coming on

4. Embed this notice
   toyotatime@merovingian.club's status on Tuesday, 10-Dec-2024 02:25:44 JST ToyotaTime

   in reply to

   @whiteman_ China isn't the enemy, and they aren't united with jews at all.

   In fact, the jews are angry that the Chinese won't allow them to influence their ruling class.

   So the jews push propaganda like this to make the Chinese out as evil.

   Jews do this to Russians as well.

   The Chinese are actually based on the JQ

5. Embed this notice
   Tiago Peixoto (tiago@social.skewed.de)'s status on Thursday, 14-Nov-2024 16:18:21 JST Tiago Peixoto

   in reply to

   @mpldr @pluralistic The exact same features that keep people away and are driving the mass migration to BlueSky instead of here. This platform has too many restrictions, which makes it more difficult to have meaningful interactions.

   For example:

   1. The purely sequential timeline means you miss a lot of relevant posts, and it's much harder to keep track of the important conversations.

   2. The lack of quotes means you can't link or make references to what others say.

   This platform added federation, but unnecessarily removed a lot a features that existed on twitter, instead of improving on them.

   Instead of fearing "the algorithm", mastodon should have given the option for users and instances to control the algorithm of their own feed.

   Bluesky added the option to "detach" a quote from a post if it turns out it's getting unwanted attention. A simpler, more elegant solution to the (frankly, exaggerated) potential abuse problem, than simply not having quotes at all.

   In short, there's less friction there, and here it feels like a pain.

6. Embed this notice
   William Lindsey :toad: (wdlindsy@toad.social)'s status on Friday, 06-Sep-2024 13:21:19 JST William Lindsey :toad:

   in reply to

   Kruse writes,

   "I’d actually welcome an even-handed approach from Sulzberger because under his leadership the coverage in the New York Times has not been evenly balanced at all.

   In the early months of 2024, and certainly after his disastrous debate performance in late June, the New York Times was on nothing less than a crusade to highlight the 'age issue' presented by the 81-year-old president’s candidacy,"

   #KamalaHarris #Biden #Trump #media #BothSidesism #FalseEquivalence #age #NYTimes
   /11