GNU social JP
  • FAQ
  • Login
GNU social JPは日本のGNU socialサーバーです。
Usage/ToS/admin/test/Pleroma FE
  • Public

    • Public
    • Network
    • Groups
    • Featured
    • Popular
    • People

Untitled attachment

Download link

Notices where this attachment appears

  1. Embed this notice
    silverpill (silverpill@mitra.social)'s status on Friday, 02-Oct-2026 04:49:42 JST silverpill silverpill
    in reply to

    @basyl @liaizon Here is a local-first ActivityPub application: https://codeberg.org/silverpill/minimitra

    In conversation about 14 days ago from mitra.social permalink
  2. Embed this notice
    silverpill (silverpill@mitra.social)'s status on Friday, 24-Apr-2026 18:01:49 JST silverpill silverpill
    in reply to

    @icedquinn @fish @phnt @sampler @p @strypey @light Nostr but human readable? That's FEP-ae97

    I was able to get it working (for the most part): https://codeberg.org/silverpill/minimitra

    In conversation about 6 months ago from gnusocial.jp permalink
  3. Embed this notice
    silverpill (silverpill@mitra.social)'s status on Sunday, 15-Mar-2026 07:13:06 JST silverpill silverpill
    in reply to

    @phnt Nostr-like experience is possible with ActivityPub, this is what I am doing with https://codeberg.org/silverpill/minimitra. It is a fat client, like Holos, except you don't need to be online all the time because the server has a copy of all data.

    In conversation about 7 months ago from mitra.social permalink
  4. Embed this notice
    silverpill (silverpill@mitra.social)'s status on Saturday, 28-Feb-2026 06:32:17 JST silverpill silverpill

    @hongminhee It is a good plan!

    FEP-ef61 is still DRAFT and includes a warning that the URI scheme may change to ap+ef61.

    Right, all of this is very unstable and may change in the future. In order to be more confident with the spec, I want to build:

    - A fully featured FEP-ae97 client (WIP: https://codeberg.org/silverpill/minimitra)
    - A generic FEP-ae97 server (this is only an idea: https://codeberg.org/silverpill/feps/src/branch/main/fc48/fep-fc48.md).

    Gateway forwarding trust. When forwarding inbox/outbox activities to other gateways, which servers should be trusted and how should that trust be established? FEP-ef61 says unsecured collections may only be accepted from servers in the actor's gateways array, but the details of how a gateway authenticates itself to another gateway are not fully specified.

    Could you clarify what you mean by authenticating itself to another gateway?

    When an application (client or server) fetches a portable collection from a server that is listed in actor's gateways array, it may skip proof verification. This applies to collections like inbox or outbox.

    If a portable collection is fetched from some other server, the proof is required.

    In conversation about 8 months ago from mitra.social permalink
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.