Untitled attachment

Another Linux Walt Alt (lnxw37b2@shitposter.world)'s status on Tuesday, 11-Mar-2025 01:37:49 JST

in reply to

@jeffcliff @NonPlayableClown

> As Slay News previously reported, doctors have just issued a chilling warning after discovering that Covid mRNA “booster” shots have begun causing a deadly virus to “awaken” in people who received the “vaccines.”

> A group of doctors confirmed that the Covid mRNA “vaccines” cause dormant tuberculosis (TB) infections to “wake up” in people.

That article is at https://slaynews.com/news/doctors-issue-red-alert-covid-boosters-begin-reawakening-deadly-virus/ and contains the same error. "Doctors have issued a chilling warning after discovering that Covid mRNA “booster” shots have begun causing a deadly virus to “awaken” in people who received the “vaccines.”"

There are actual studies connecting SARS-CoV-2 with resurgence of tuberculosis, but those studies do not connect the vaccines. If Slay had any interest besides spreading known-untrue information, they could start by visiting https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10546619/ and using that as a basis for searching out studies.

They failed 6th grade biology. TB is caused by a bacterium, not a virus. https://www.cdc.gov/tb/causes/index.html

And high school statistics. The report ( https://parl-gc.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/delivery/01CALP_INST:01CALP/12165649990002616?lang=en ) clearly states: "Please note that these are crude numbers and do not account for the number of people in each vaccination status category" ... which means there are NO conclusions that can be drawn from the data. (If some high fraction of people are vaccinated, and vaccinated people had similar health status, then unless a similar fraction of deaths are people who were vaccinated, it would still show the vaccines having a positive effect on mortality.)

Canada is a different country, so I don't know how they did it. But in the US, government sponsored vaccination campaigns focused on reaching the elderly first. I'd expect, therefore, a different health profile from the beginning versus non-vaxxed individuals.

I really wish they'd taken the mRNA and mixed it with yeasts or bacteria, so they could extract the proteins this freak-out wouldn't have happened in the first place.

> Meanwhile, leading scientists from the world-renowned Yale University have confirmed that Covid mRNA injections cause vaccine-acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (VAIDS).

Let's follow that link and see what sort of evidence they have. https://slaynews.com/news/yale-scientists-confirm-covid-vaccines-cause-vaids/ ... leads to https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.02.18.25322379v1.full.pdf .

> The rapid development and deployment of COVID-19 vaccines have been pivotal in59
mitigating the impact of the pandemic1. These vaccines have significantly reduced60
severe illness and mortality associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection2. Additionally,61
vaccinated individuals experience a lower incidence of post-acute sequelae of COVID-62
19 (PASC) or long COVID, thus highlighting an additional potential benefit of receiving63
the COVID-19 vaccines 3, 4. However, COVID-19 vaccines are associated with rare64
acute adverse events 5 such as myocarditis and pericarditis 6, thrombosis and65
thrombocytopenia7, Guillain–Barre syndrome, transverse myelitis, and Bell’s Palsy8,9.66
In addition, some individuals have reported post-vaccination symptoms resembling long67
COVID beginning shortly after vaccination. This condition, sometimes referred to as68
post-vaccination syndrome (PVS) or post-acute COVID-19 vaccination syndrome69
(PACVS) 10, 11, is characterized by symptoms such as exercise intolerance, excessive70
fatigue, numbness, brain fog, neuropathy, insomnia, palpitations, myalgia, tinnitus or71
humming in ears, headache, burning sensations, and dizziness10. Unlike long COVID,72
PVS is not officially recognized by health authorities, which has significantly limited73
patient care and support.

Okay, so Slay is trumpeting the small fraction who have had adverse effects after vaccination while ignoring the far larger set of symptoms prevented by the vaccines? Sounds like they aren't reliable at all. They even make up something ("VAIDS") that doesn't exist in the paper linked.