Excerpt from Amnesty International report: "As outlined below, Amnesty International considers this an overly cramped interpretation of international jurisprudence and one that would effectively preclude a finding of genocide in the context of an armed conflict...."

Notices where this attachment appears

1. Embed this notice
   justcare (justcare@sfba.social)'s status on Friday, 06-Dec-2024 02:41:49 JST justcare

   in reply to

   @inthehands The problem here is that the ICC and Amnesty adjust their processes and words to fit the accusation, not the other way around.

   For instance, Amnesty quite literally changed the definition of genocide to fit the accusation. Additionally, they champion people like Walid Daqqa.

   Meanwhile, the ICC both lacks jurisdiction in the Israel / Hamas war (due to both the status of the territory and conditions of the Oslo Accords), and ignores far more open and flagrant violations of human rights by countries such as North Korea, Iran, and Syria.

   These double-standards and shifting definitions to fit accusations, rather than accusations to fit definitions, is in itself antisemitic.