The fight scene was pathetic too. Started in a fog cloud, cut away to other things, back to the action (still in fog), door closes so we can't see again, door breaks, they fight up the stairs in partial darkness, and when they get up to the roof it's foggy again and then the camera cuts away at least one more time while the fight was still happening.
It's like they were *terrified* by the idea of properly choreographing and filming a fight scene.
@killyourfm It seriously did. I remember telling people that Lnux is actually good for gaming before the Steam Deck would get you the title of clown at the very least.
I still rememeber how people perception of Linux changed little by little and that's still happening.
It's great to see how successful the device was and here's hoping that SteamOS cna become the norm for handheld devices! :)
Hope that clarifies things enough for the Nazis, but also for the Dems who couldn't find a spine to prevent this from happening.
It was absolutely possible to write like this before, and to avert the social crisis that's going to unfold.
https://newrepublic.com/post/189950/trump-son-greenland
You know what’s happening.
It’s not ignorance.
It’s privilege.
A note on the population.
I strongly suspect the recent census data is bungled. It makes sense that the town is shrinking, but probably not as much as is showing on paper.
If this story sounds incredible to you-- you need to take the super tiny size of the town into account to understand how this could be happening.
It looks like this church is the main source of social organization in the area-- though despite the towns size there are probably like 8 churches there.
https://www.facebook.com/pages/First%20Baptist%20Church%20Newbern,%20Al/273998409599258/
@Weeble The idea of a defed is that they won’t really get stuff from the defedded instance, and said instance won’t “follow” your defedded instance, but it doesn’t really “stop interaction”. It’s saying Host A doesn’t want to see Host B at all nor follow it, but it won’t cuck Host B in attempts to see it’s content just to be an asshole.
It makes federation harder in theory and even breaks it. Say, Host B simply wants to say their opinion on what Host A said without Host A having a single clue of what was said. This means Host C or Host D or Host E can pitch in to “your” reply, even if Host A is unaware of what’s happening.
It doesn’t stop “bullying” either, anyone can screenshot Host A’s post. Of course, I can still view the replied status from Host C or even Host A directly (meaning, the content is public), it just introduces this little gap in federation.
Yes, it is technically a “real block”, but a real block is against the idea of federation. All attempts to delete old posts on the Fediverse are theoretically impossible since instances can very simply reject status deletes. Federation is censorship resistant, if something gets censored or deleted, it’s never truly gone.
To add, you might even ask “why do we have deletion requests in the first place if Fedi is about anti-censorship?”. As always, they can be ignored, but most instances accept rejects because rejects can be used in good faith to ban spam accounts, make post edits, etc.
Sorry for the words words words :marseywords: post. At the end of the day it’s completely up to the instance and what they want to do, but it always leads me to ask why they are on the Fediverse to begin with.
GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.
All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.