GNU social JP
  • FAQ
  • Login
GNU social JPは日本のGNU socialサーバーです。
Usage/ToS/admin/test/Pleroma FE
  • Public

    • Public
    • Network
    • Groups
    • Featured
    • Popular
    • People

s-300 range.jpg

Download link

https://freespeechextremist.com/media/f087b210-464d-4daf-8f5a-b932469cb857/s-300%20range.jpg?name=s-300%20range.jpg

Notices where this attachment appears

  1. Embed this notice
    PonyPanda (ponypanda@freespeechextremist.com)'s status on Thursday, 17-Nov-2022 17:04:47 JST PonyPanda PonyPanda
    in reply to

    @a7 @tard the west doesn’t want WW3. That involves them getting hurt. They wanted to weaken Russia. They wanted to set Afghan trap 2.0 for Russia . They thought…

    1. Russia pissing on optics and conducting the special military operation would fuck them over economically because of sanctions
    2. Russia would burn it’s military capabilities and they could do what they always do and swoop in like vultures to carrions
    3. In all the chaos Nordstream 2 would be blown up and that would majorly fuck Russia and force Europe to be on team America

    But…

    • Russia 4D chess’d sanctions with rubles4gas
    • Russia had a very limited deployment and put BTGs as the centerpiece of the conflict
    • Russia bombed all non-nuclear energy production facilities and now can Europe’s energy from the Zaporozhiye powerplant

    NATO aren’t doing anything because they CAN’T do anything. They gave Ukraine most of their weapons and Ukraine burnt them or sold them to Russia. Now that Russia have decided to do airstrikes, all of NATO are bickering among themselves to keep their scant air-defense weapons as if they’d help against the orcs. That’s why Mark Milley was calling for negotiations.

    And I’m not sure exactly what your fixation with the the S-300 missile is. I don’t know if you ACTUALLY believe the Ukrainian narrative or if you’re more curious about why NATO/America aren’t acting on a very flimsy causus belli because they’ve gone with false pretexts for war in the past. But if you actually do think Russia did it, I’ll just point out that when Russia were conducting their airstrikes, they used KH-101 and Kalibr cruise missiles launched from TU-95s and they were spotted flying from the Black Sea and Volgograd. Russia wouldn’t use a S-300 because it’s an air-defense weapon and air-defense is precious. Even if they have the newer S-400s… I don’t understand the point of shooting two random S-300s at Polish farms. Not exactly a high value target for such an expensive weapon. There’s also the fact that their BTGs and other units are all far south and east of the Polish border. Well outside the range of the S-300 of 150km.


    s-300 range.jpg
    In conversation Thursday, 17-Nov-2022 17:04:47 JST from freespeechextremist.com permalink
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.