Untitled attachment

Notices where this attachment appears

1. Embed this notice
   yawnbox :verified_gay: (yawnbox@disobey.net)'s status on Saturday, 09-Dec-2023 10:19:46 JST yawnbox :verified_gay:

   100%, @mmasnick

   "Our brief was more focused on highlighting how these issues go beyond just the 1st Amendment concerns of big websites, but how they might impact a new generation of #social media platforms, like #Bluesky and #Mastodon, whose very models and infrastructure are fundamentally different from the “giant silos” of today’s major social media platforms."

   https://www.techdirt.com/2023/12/07/we-teamed-up-with-bluesky-to-tell-the-supreme-court-how-state-social-media-laws-dont-take-into-account-user-empowerment/

2. Embed this notice
   Cathy Gellis (cathygellis@mastodon.cloud)'s status on Saturday, 09-Dec-2023 03:14:42 JST Cathy Gellis

   I wrote and filed one of the most important amicus briefs I've ever written. It is for the combined NetChoice cases at the Supreme Court challenging laws passed by FL and TX to regulate online speech via regulating the platforms enabling it. But really it is about whether the First Amendment still applies online.

   I wrote it on behalf of the Copia Institute, @mchris, who administers techpolicy.social, and Bluesky.

   https://www.techdirt.com/2023/12/07/we-teamed-up-with-bluesky-to-tell-the-supreme-court-how-state-social-media-laws-dont-take-into-account-user-empowerment/

3. Embed this notice
   Luis Villa (luis_in_brief@social.coop)'s status on Friday, 08-Dec-2023 15:44:46 JST Luis Villa

   in reply to

   Techdirt/Bluesky/ @mmasnick / @mchris "in his capacity as a Mastodon server operator": https://www.techdirt.com/2023/12/07/we-teamed-up-with-bluesky-to-tell-the-supreme-court-how-state-social-media-laws-dont-take-into-account-user-empowerment/