As many people express their outrage about #Russia attacks on civilian areas of towns and describe them in terms of “irrational cruelty”, I’m afraid it is very much rational within the framework of Russia’s strategic goal. Which, after many iterations, now boils down to not losing the war.
It’s mostly us, the Western society, who notoriously don’t get it and still assume Putin’s Russia is after some kind of “deal” here. If he was, then yes, it would be irrational. But he isn’t.
Most interestingly, Russian propagandists voice this quite openly. It’s just that we are in some kind of denial, just as when Bolsheviks were talking about “eradication of bourgeoisie as a class” the West imagined they’re using the word “eradication” somehow “figuratively”.
The purpose of these attacks is to sow the sense of insecurity, depression and terror among Ukrainian society so that it stops resisting and just gives up, agreeing to whatever terms Russia is ready to offer now.
Unfortunately, these attacks will only intensify before and during the winter as Russian leadership apparently started to grasp that they may not be able to afford yet another year of war and Ukraine’s fall in military terms is not at all imminent, as they lulled themselves for the last two years.
Putin’s increasing cruelty is likely a direct consequence of his own increasing insecurity, based on the processes visible publicly (Russia’s economic decline, Kursk offensive) and those which we don’t see (secret public opinion polls).
So today’s attack on Lviv was entirely planned to hit civilian quarters, just as the “Okhmatdit” hospital attack. Emotional reactions are natural, but they’re not going to change anything - there will be more.
If you can, the best thing to do is to donate to the #Ukraine army or humanitarian funds, because they are what actually do change situation on the ground. One Russian strategic bomber destroyed in Russia one less delivery vehicle for the rockets such as those that hit Lviv houses or hospital in Kyiv.
@clintruin @QasimRashid Religion doesn't enter into it at all. I know I shouldn't even be starting this argument because it's utterly pointless, but calling this a religious war is like calling the Troubles a religious war.
It has nothing to do with gods. Many Israelis are not religious. Many Palestinians are not Muslim. These crude oversimplifications only serve to stoke up hatred in the rest of the world, against the Jews or the Muslims, or religion in general.
#RedSeaWar #Houthis #Yemen #Strategy
(4/n)
..."the #Pentagon is trying to thread an impossibly tiny needle:
making a dent in the #Houthis’ ability to hit commercial and Navy vessels without dragging the #UnitedStates into a prolonged war.
It is a difficult task, made more so because the Houthis have perfected the tactics of irregular warfare, #American military officials say. 👉The group does not have many big weapons depots for American fighter jets to bomb —...
@ned
Then the world calls this a war when a non state minority is fighting for land they own and the mighty power and sanctioned state sends 10 fold back. That's not a war.
It's a slaughter of a people that deserve better. Just for standing up for themselves
GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.
All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.