@indigotyrian @LavenderPawprints I've also been personally blocked by Eugen, by the way.
So, not only were my criticisms ignored, I was basically told "Fuck you, misinformation isn't a problem, go away"....
@shadyspotlight @TheOtherDibbler
The theme is the outfits that Stray Kids wore in a performance. It was part of their 5-star album promotion & each outfit featured stars in some way.
So you are right! The theme is stars. But it's filtered through stray kids.
@eriner @Bunnyslope @istvan @SecuriTee @ned
I have done similar.
For compatibility with FRS and GRMS radios i preprogram those channels in and label them that way.
So if they type 01 it will move them to the right freq.
I also specify for them a "local" (low power) calling channel / frequency": Ch01
And a high-power "wide" calling channel / frequency: Ch15
ALSO add if they are using FRS radios they should set their "privacy codes" to 0 on those channels or they won't here most traffic.
Ooof, you should be careful with that, LGB is mostly used by transphobes who want to divide the movement.
I think you know by now I judge an idea by its own merit, not its association with any one group or not.
non-insignificant way a descriptor of a political movement/group that has shared political interests,
I have no problem combining the acronyms when the context makes sense to do so . If I am speaking of something that actually has combined relevance to both I can always say LGBP+TICN and then otherwise leave them seperate when i am talking specifically about orientation vs gender.
Other than the political connection there is also the fact that gender and sexual attraction are pretty strongly connected for most people, so it even makes sense to lump them together from a purely categorization perspective.
Sure, plenty of times the two groups make sense to talk about collectively, just as often it makes sense to talk about one or the other. Ultimately which of the two, or both, that might be used will depend on context. As it should.
If you dislike the acronym then “gender and sexual minorities” is a pretty neutral way of referring to the group,
Its not that I dislike the acronym per se. Itis that it 1) includes terms which have no useful meaning (queer) and really have no relevance in most context and 2) it is so generalized as to be less useful than being able to have the means properly categorized in a semantic way.
So the quote you offer simply doesnt address number 2 and defeats the purpose.
Oh, and being intersex isn’t in any way about gender expression
Absolutely is for much of intersexed conditions, though you are right sometimes it is sex and not gender.
For example Androgen Insensitivity Syndrom is an intersex condition that directly effects your bodies expression of gender. By contrast Klinefelter syndrom effects both how your gender is expressed (effects yoru genitals, body, body hair, height, etc) and yoru sex (dna).
The only real difference is that intersex is clearly not a choice WRT to gender expression whereas the other ones are choices in gender expersssion.
and being trans and being a crossdresser are about gender expression in quite different ways.
Very different for sure, but still gender expression all the same. Obviously again we go back to context, if we are talking about gender in such a way that the distinction between these groups is needed, then that can be expressed on a case by case basis, as it should be.
@mariusor @mfru I am not baiting you. I am looking to deeper sources of philosophical disagreement so we can work backwards to build up a self-consistent worldview that justifies your opinion. It's much easier to settle our disagreement this way.
So: given that you agree that space needs to be made for discussing behavior like Stallman's, why is my article on the subject inappropriate and/or how is denying it access to the discourse justified under this lens?
So, guess what I found out? The term "Fediverse" is now considered a marketing buzzword according to eMarketer. And you know what they say, when eMarketer says it's a marketing buzzword, it's definitely one!
(Okay, nobody actually says this -- except me right now. 🤓)
Anyway, the interesting part is why they think marketers should pay attention to it:Fediverse platforms are ad-free, meaning they probably aren’t top of mind for advertisers. But if fediverse platforms were to take off, brands would no longer be beholden to big social media companies in the same way.So, to sum it up for you, marketers might not be immediately interested in the Fediverse because of its ad-free nature. But you know what marketers really don't like? Depending on platforms like Meta (formerly Facebook) and X (formerly Twitter).
https://www.insiderintelligence.com/content/5-marketing-buzzwords-worth-knowing
GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.
All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.