Of Mastodon, Threads and Bluesky, Mastodon/Fediverse is still the best for me. It's where I get better engagement, more thoughtful posts and replies, more authenticity, fewer trolls, more global reach, and better overall UX. I'm intending to be somewhat active on all three platforms, but I'm going to favor the Fediverse for the time being.
If you're reading this, and you have the means, please donate to a cause or organization that supports marginalized communities. I've donated to Trevor Project and Malala Fund in the past week.
For the avoidance of doubt: nothing changes. MAGA is still a hate cult. Climate change is still real. Earth is still round. Vaccines are still effective. Trans and non-binary people are valid. Women are people. Black lives matter. Love is love. No person is illegal. Hold your ground. Double down.
Seems like an apt time for a (re)intro message. I'm Dan. I'm a US/UK dual national living in London. I work for Samsung on open source stuff. I co-chair @tag am a member of @openssf Technical Advisory Council, and a co-founder of @openwebdocs. I care about how technology impacts society. 👋
My talk from Open Source Summit on Wide Review (of standards / specifications) is now live! https://youtu.be/jmRrj48CRE0 This talk goes into some detail on why #WideReview is important, how it works in W3C (and in @tag), and how it contributes to a better future, particularly when including #Ethical and #HumanrRights considerations. #OSSummit#OpenSourceSummit
I really appreciated this talk from @kelseyhightower (who it seems is not posting here anymore, unfortunately, but I hope he returns) at Open Source Summit about the importance of community in open source. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NIvSgk0oV7Y
Now hearing a talk from UN office on Human Rights on the relationship between technical standards and human rights - quoting some text from the @tag ethical web principles: "we need to put internationally recognised human rights at the core of the web platform." ❤️ cf https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/4031373
@aral I agree with you. However we only have the power to set policy inside the @w3c itself. So this document is about moderating behaviour on mailing lists, in physical meetings and events, in GutHub threads, etc... We can't stop people pursuing unethical business models, but the thinking behind this, and documents like the Ethical Web Principles https://www.w3.org/TR/ethical-web-principles/, is to ensure these business models don't get baked into the fabric of the web itself.
Very pleased that @w3c has published its updated #CodeOfConduct (which is now appropriately named a "code of conduct"). I'm proud to be one of the individuals named as having contributed into this document. https://www.w3.org/policies/code-of-conduct/
Something I worked on in @tag (the Ethical Web Principles) was quoted in a UN report on human rights in technical standards: https://undocs.org/en/A/HRC/53/42. It's nice to see our work picked up here, and it's also nice to see that there is a rising awareness across the board that ethics and human rights need to be taken into account in the technical standards process.
@evan BTW threads being non-functional for me looks like it has to do with their buggy IP geofencing to block access in the EU (which itself is part of the problem). See above.
Open Source Strategist at Samsung and general Open Web Curmudgeon.W3C @tag co-chair; @openwebdocs co-founder; @openssf TAC member; Gov UK Open Standards Board member.Immigrant, UK/US Dual National; Film, MST3K, Science Fiction, Anime, #HonkaiStarRail fan; anti-fascist & card-carrying “tofu-eating wokerati.”Banner art credit: Mr Doodle (photo by me).He/Him.