@thomasfuchs sounds like something NLNet might get behind? I dunno. Fully agree that it's something that the public would benefit from, but it's hard for me to see how to get there from here.
@thomasfuchs oh right of course. No, I don't think that's available, at least for free.
Being serious for a bit, that's not really a fair thing to ask of an open source project. That's something you pay quite a lot of money to IBM or Wind River or (gag) Microsoft for.
@thomasfuchs the unsloth q4_k_xl quant of that seems to do ok and will probably be much faster to cycle. The unsloth page also gives a bunch of guidance on tuning to reduce how much looping it gets up to. https://unsloth.ai/docs/models/qwen3.6
@thomasfuchs I wrote "thanks I hate it" into Claude code yesterday and it _took a secret psychiatrist note memory_ about it. "zrail is resistant to AI adoption" in a semi-hidden directory.
@thomasfuchs on the one hand a basic design lasting that long is awesome. On the other, reusing the shuttle stack inflated costs by an enormous amount vs what a clean sheet design probably would have cost.
@thomasfuchs yeah variants. Wiki says the -190 on the shuttle is the only reusable version. Wonder if they actually used flown engines for the orbiter like they did for the launcher.
@thomasfuchs it's actually relatively specific. It defines a router as a consumer grade device that is intended to be installed in a residential environment that primarily forwards IP packets. It also only affects FCC approval for _new_ devices. Anything currently installed or in distribution channels is not affected.
@thomasfuchs plus the spicy random number generator! So most of the time you get an engine sometimes you get, oh let's say a brick, and the magic machine will attempt to gaslight you that they're equivalent.