Notices by amelia (miado@discuss.systems)

wow asplos rejected us without any feedback for the most bullshit reason. I've been rejected many times, at least then I was given feedback in the discussion summary as to why I got rejected, here they just repeated the same false claims about our paper (which they clearly didn't read) and then said 'also vibes are off so no'.

is there a place I can post these reviews so that there's some accountability for the insane chatgptness and laziness of it? Like give me some feedback that isn't saying "you didn't do this" with 'this' being something that I had an entire subsection on in the paper

@va2lam their response to our rebuttal is "this paper is a description of an existing system, not a research contribution" because our research has become a fairly large open source project and we took a while to write the papers because asplos keeps assigning us shit reviewers every year. So basically, if your research is open source it no longer counts as research is what they're telling me