Notices by Renato (renatofq@mastodon.social)

@eibhear @gutocarvalho

I see your point. But, legally, if someone took the job, they would be signing a paper saying that they take legal responsibility for Musk's decisions in Brazil, since they have no actual power. On the other hand the Judge could rule that the since this person have no actual power they cannot be the legal representative and cannot be indicted... but we are at the realm of speculation now.

@eibhear @gutocarvalho

I don't know if the legal representative would be arrested right away, but they would be under such risk for sure. But I don't see human's right violation there. I don't know what is your country but I would bet that you can be arrested if you refuse to comply with judiciary decisions.

You seem to be arguing that this person would have not the power to comply with the decisions, but if that's the case, this person is not an actual representative, right?

@eibhear @gutocarvalho

I understand that. But I don't see how someone who cannot make decisions can be a legal representative for a company. Being legal representative is exactly about being legally responsible for it.

The closing of the Twitter office in Brazil was precisely to avoid law enforcement, and Musk said that publicly.