Notices by Lucas Oliveira (fptbb@mastodon.social)

@umvitor @netblocks @gutocarvalho The argument is wrong when you see that the accounts they are trying to ban that resulted ultimately in the removal of the representatives are ALL political dissidents, the real criminals X never refused a legal inquiry to ban. The punishment for that kind of account is already on the constitution and this decisions by itself where extremely exaggerated. Also, VPN ban is not at all in the law.

@umvitor @netblocks It's not, for a judge to ban a person, they need to argue with a real motive in the law, the motives for the people in question are not crime in the country law, they are political bans with no base at all in the law. The platform is not refusing to ban real criminals, mostly political dissidents, then using this they targeted the representatives of the platform forcing them to leave or to be jailed without the option to argue, then, there's the ban, and fines of +-8k for vpn

@umvitor @netblocks @gutocarvalho NO, this is wrong, X participated for Years, but Moraes is the judge and all the other parts of the process, he simply rejected every time, even the valid ones, In Brazil you have the right to question the judge, yes, if it goes against the constitution or the law, this is just persecution in the purest form, because they did not have the legal process to it, this is what they call "Inquisitorial justice" when made by 1 person.