I'm watching students wrestle with defining what 'urban' means, and also thinking about what 'urbanists' think they mean, and in particular, the city-exceptionalism that sometimes happens.
I have colleagues who began ministry when I did but chose to go into large churches rather than medium sized or small ones, who are continually like "in the LARGE CHURCH CONTEXT" and then describe a staffing or programming situation that in a lot of ways is ANY program-sized church. They assume their experience is specific and exceptional because they are continually told that it is, but in a lot of cases a church institution and its problems are similar and translatable. (There are limits to this argument, but not so many as large church-serving ministers would imagine.)
Similarly, people say things about "urban places" that often actually are true of anywhere we haven't gutted, displaced, disinvested in and wholly abandoned.
Thriving TOWNS have a lot of the benefits that people call "urban."