It does exist, but the users are not lapping up the propaganda nearly as much. Also, the larger part of those with that hyper aggressive Western liberal behavior usually come out as Russian expats when pressed about it.
>article is from 2009 It's very on point, things have only gotten worse and the problems much more pervasive, he even talks about neural nets. And it's the exact same problem: "Based on our pitch material our VC backed startup will grow to 1 billion users in 6 months, we need to address this before we even have a product."
>gRPC It reminded of Erlang type rpc functionality as a band aid to the rat's nest problem you mentioned.
>commercially available bananas are clones >it's better to locally source your binaries I doubt the people pushing for these can manage their own systems the traditional way. The projects they build are so similar that it feels like they are just repeating the same exact narrow skillset they've been trained for at their job. They also completely ignore the process by which OSS is being created and maintained, that is by teams of people working together without a cabal dictating how things should interact.
A lot of these problems would probably be further exaggerated by the type of monetized OSS development that has turned android into a shitheap. Just whoever is funding a big chunk of OSS projects trying to terraform the landscape into something more centralized and easily controlled.
>https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2024/06/seeing-like-a-data-structure.html That was an excellent article! Very nice blog aesthetics too.
Also got me very interested in the book he mentions "Seeing Like a State" by James C. Scott.
Lately I've been trying to understand why I myself used to think so much in this type of abstractions. It takes conscious effort to reject abstractions and understand how things work down to a human level. I was always doing it, even before I started to extensively use the net. I'd blame it on my eccentricities but then everybody else does it too. There must be some psychological processes going on here that eventually manifests themselves in all human built systems from the polis to the world wide web. And it is probably the same reason so many people seem to prefer online interactions and parasocialization than irl encounters, zoomers seem to prefer porn than actual sex.
There are economic reasons too, because in order to get to these levels of dissociation and treating each others like numbers you need to be wealthy enough to shield yourself from the various indignities of normal interaction, the consequences of your actions.
There's also the political situation that plays a role here. I've been increasingly embedding myself in Russian online spaces for the past couple of years and the difference in conversational quality is huge. No matter the specific platform, from imageboards to niche forums, to mainstream social media people can discuss and disagree over matters that cannot be openly talked about here due to extreme bad faith from moderators and their protected groups. The actual quality of information shared is also for the most part above and beyond what you find on Western sites and above all it is *legible* as Schneier says.
I've been thinking for a year now that most online spaces have turned completely unintelligible with people just shouting opinions that don't even make sense outside the context they originally heard them from. You read a thread on an imageboard or forum and the posts make zero sense, like reading a foreign language or something.
Hey @p I have a question. Why are microservices still pushed so hard?
I know that g*ogle is pushing microservices hard internally, trains their own employees and when they leave that's all they know how to do. Add to that those aspiring to work at g*ogle and those aping g*ogle. Still, github is filled with new projects about terraform, k8s, and many stand alone microservices (most of them close copies of one another) even after all these years that this trend has been going on.
1. As more people use the internet, the number of large websites increases, making certain niches that were deployed as part of a bigger system viable on their own. This is not true however for websites that will remain small-medium in size where microservices are too big of a hustle. 2. I've noticed the same people pushing for microservices, push for "immutable" OS type standarization. 3. Pretty sure gRPC is also a component of whatever is their end game.
I'm trying to figure out what's their end goal here, because all this seems planned and I don't think it's for the good of the open internet however much they say it is. I thought you might know more since you've been observing the trend far longer than I have.
>Nginx I don't think nginx is a typical micro service. It has a shitload of features, a ton of plugins and can be stretched to support a multitude of use cases. It even comes with a scripting language
>Microservices as unix philosophy I get that. The the problem is that the web is not an OS and there is a difference between an online service and a utility application. I also get that the plan is to make it turn it into WebOS that has g*ogle at the center with OSS programmers being abstracted away along with the hardware.
>Nix and Talos My problem with these is the same problem I have with gentoo, and I'm gonna paraphrase @p here, when you learn gentoo, nix, Talos you don't learn unix, building programs or running in Ram, you learn gentoo, nix, Talos. Whereas with CRUX and Slack you do learn unix. And if you need to, you can minimize disk writes without having to go through next-best-thing and all the baggage it carries with it.