@Gargron@Jonathanglick Hi guys, the head of our audience team is @Annadubenko and @jakegrovum is her deputy for external platforms. I know they are observing all the so-called Twitter "alternatives" -- and I realize that is not quite the way to think of Mastodon, which is its own thing. There are also resource implications for anything we do. [Personally, I've encountered a lot of resistance here to our subscription business model.]
Mastodon is the only site where a user is guaranteed to gripe about a paywalled article every time. Folks, ads are dead. Subscriptions pay for the journalism and feed our families. A trial sub is cheap. I give away a lot of free links. You can read many with an email (regi-wall is not a paywall). It is easy to get around with research. You do you. Just don’t reply with a complaint or a paywall evasion. It’s kind of rude. I may block you. Move on. Read something else. It’s a big old internet.
@feditips I don't see the harm. I also verify myself through my own blog. If people want assurance that I am the verified @palafo pre-Elon from Twitter, that's really all that list is offering. Not everyone has a blog or a site these days. If my employer figures out a way to verify me, I'll switch to that.
Editor, breaking/trending news. I am not The New York Times; I just work there. Observer. Reporter. Writer. Zen Buddhist. Chess player. Cyclist. Music lover. Constant reader. Tech geek. Podcast fan. Fact-based. Pro-science. Anti-bigot. Imperfect human, just like you.