Notices by Lux 🦊 :flag_nonbinary: ΘΔ (sharplimefox@eldritch.cafe), page 3

"this is how you should protect the intellectual property that can be extracted from your research before transferring it to an economic actor" bullshit, utter bullshit, i will leak every single bit of code i write, i will slap the GPLv3 on it to make it radioactive to patent lawyers, i will leak my own papers to scihub. fight me.

we should romanticize the theft of intellectual property more than we already do

On the same day the #wikipediafr poll asking how they should deadname trans people closes, poll which saw contributors (including long time established ones) banned for "infringement of well-behaving rules" (calling out transphobia) or POV pushing (calling out transphobia), multiple edits are suddenly being made on the Wikipedia page of Elliot Page to change mentions of him as an "actor" (male noun in french) to a "celebrity" (female noun in french), allowing for multiple grammatical gender markers to be switched from male to female, despite the fact that they describe Elliot.

https://social.apreslanu.it/@tk/111993325860793301

EDIT: some editors also attempted to add pre-transition photos of him to the article as well. This comes at an especially bad time as the official @wikipedia_fr account highlighted the article today (in what was likely a post scheduled a while back, but definitely should have been retracted considering the tension in the room)

i'm sorry, GNU imp, but what the fuck

So, let us drag the french admins of wikipedia into the dirt, shall we? I have gathered stuff from the last couple days of the ongoing events, and taken time to translate them so that english-speaking people can realize the depth of the nonsense going on over there. Because that community is the way it is, it's very obtuse and flowery french that's used in their discussions, peppered with acronyms that contract french expressions or wikipedia slang, and so translators could be somewhat unreliable.

The context here is that very clearly biased poll which questions I dutifully translated for you. The central crux was trying to standardize the way we trans people are discussed, especially with respect to mentions of our deadname. Please appreciate the irony of mostly cis people asking mostly cis people if it's okay to deadname us and how exactly they should do it.

The poll wasn't really advertised, until a couple of posts here and there shared it and called for us and our allies to come and express our opinion, in the most tame and neutral tones possible.

The original criterion for votes to be accepted was 50 contributions on general pages (which excludes niche technical contributions). On top of being a vast amount of contributions, it was discussed:

• to maybe exclude accounts for which those last 50 were too far in the past: "For the record, tallying the last 50 contributions of all accounts (and only those from 2024), I created a list of eligible accounts for the poll. [...] One flagrant example is Nicky, whose last contribution is from 2007, and then one in 2024... yeah right [condescending]. Not sure my methodology is more exhaustive than that of Lebrouillard, but it exists."
• to raise it to 500: "Hello, I am making a dedicated section. Clearly, there is ongoing brigading. Therefore, please raise the threshold for acceptable ballots to 500 contributions." (which is ludicrous, that's more than one a day for more than a whole year)

Following this poll being suddenly widely talked about, and the opinions tipping, french editors opened a note on the admin bulletin, accusing trans contributors of being activists and biased: "Diversity of opinion in activist communities? Hilarious"

Administrators of french wikipedia have also gone out of their way to identify the wikipedia accounts of some of the people whose posts I linked above, calling for indefinite bans, bans over a defined period, as well as blanket bans on all pages related to the topic of being trans. In that particular link, the administrators consider the use of "transphobia" in a content warning, as a form of slander and harassment organized outside of the platform: "JohnNewton8(sysop): [...] Sinkra's message could moreover be interpreted as libelous (accusation of transphobia) [...] / Jules: I believe the use of "trigger warning: transphobia" on Sinkra's post to not be targeting individual contributors but warning Sinkra's audience which may be sensitive to some of the comments being shared on the poll."

The worst part about that last bit? Complains from the admins that they have to deal with similar "brigading" and "biased activist editing" by an organisation called "Les Sans Pages" (LSP, "Those without a Page"), which is dedicated to helping reduce the abysmal gender bias in biographical wikipedia pages. "It is not the first time that accounts, including old accounts, drag our principles into the mud. Regularly, activists from LSP create controversy [...]"

This is beyond horrendous behaviour from the french wikipedia editors, with the full support of their administrators, who are willing to enforce guidelines and the code of conduct against those calling for a biased poll to happen under somewhat fair circumstances. Shame on the admins, who should be removed from their position, and clearly let the mask slip. Shame on the editors, whose bias and bigotry they hide under the guide of encyclopedic guidelines and neutrality, while shifting the blame on us for trying to be heard.

(thanks however to @belore for gathering most of the links on here)

Pire encore pour beaucoup leurs infos et les communication sont concentrées sur des serveurs discord, donc totalement fermés et sous le contrôle de quelques personnes très précises; t'as intérêt à pas être en froid avec elleux.

Rappel semi-fréquent que l'organisation de la commu trans en France est remplie de single point of failure catastrophiques qui font que si deux ou trois assos tombent on perd une masse phénoménale d'informations

.well-known/fursona/ when

OH: "i don't crack eggs, i just gently tap "men" with a spoon to see if they're done cooking"

taps timeline like a glass pane is anyone even human in there

Je prédis une augmentation rapide de ces 3 choses à Rennes:

• les accidents de vélo
• les amendes pour vélo (abusives et pas abusives)
• les bouchons dans les pistes vélo (c'est déjà plus ou moins le cas même si on est pas encore au bouchon)

@aearil la ligne B étant morte y'a une augmentation monstrueuse de la fréquentation des pistes vélo en centre ville et aussi des bouchons atroces avec des gens à nerf. J'ai déjà fait les frais ce soir d'un groupe de flics zélé qui s'est posé sur le bord de la rue pour pull les cyclistes pas assez éclairés à leur goût (j'ai rien eu heureusement), et j'ai jamais autant eu de situations dangereuses à vélo condensées sur des trajets aussi courts que ces deux derniers jours.

Et ça va pas s'améliorer

I don't like the feeling of being an administrator for the services I host as the idea it puts me on a higher level of decision in regards to people doing things they want.
I prefer the idea that I am a janitor: I clean dust off, I tighten bolts here and there, and I make sure there's no water leak.

I'm free access both in the sense that my partners can do whatever to me whenever, but also that I'm tagged with access=yes