I know discussions of university overhead sound boring but, hang with me, they're important. I wrote something about why, if you care about science in America, you should care about overhead.
The gov't is slashing university research overhead rates, claiming it saves money. Overhead funds essential infrastructure that enables research: HVAC, IT support, lab construction, and admin - not waste. Cutting this means that univ. will be unable to afford to conduct research.
The likely result? Critical research will relocate to "China, Europe, and other regions with rational research funding models." This policy will surrender America's competitive edge and benefit our economic, intellectual, and military competitors. Like China.
My new post on The Climate Brink: LA fire's toxic legacy: When wildfires turn cities into smoke. It talks about air pollution from wildfires, the connection to climate change, and Table 12.12 from the last IPCC report.
Many of these people are former colleagues from when I worked on the stratosphere. About 10 years ago, I thought that the stratosphere was done — all of the interesting questions had been answered.
The last few years have proven me wrong. Probably the most amazing was the eruption of Hunga Tonga, but there were also fires dumping combustion products deep into the stratosphere, and some extreme ozone hole events.
This article also identifies one of the most important stratospheric issues. Over the last few years, my estimate of the odds that we'll engage in solar radiation management has gone from "no way" to "yeah, I can really see this happening".
Worryingly, some rogue actor might start geoengineering without any kind of global agreement. See, e.g., the book Termination Shock for a surprisingly plausible scenario. Or the bozos at Make Sunsets.
Very interesting article from the NYTimes about scientists on the front lines of monitoring the stratosphere to detect if someone starts geoengineering.
Just to be clear, this is a joke. Of course, renewable energy is not responsible for the destruction of Hurricane Helene. Instead, we know that fossil fuels are making the hurricane more damaging.
Prof of Atmospheric Sciences & climate scientist @ Texas A&M; book: Introduction to Modern Climate Change; AGU and AAAS Fellow; Native TexanFind out what I think on https://www.theclimatebrink.com