Olivier stripped the original 4h down to 2½. Behind the camera he convinces as much as in front of the camera as the lead character. 19-year-old Jean Simmons impresses as Ophelia. Stanley Holloway’s vignette is glorious.
Pretty good. Hugely sensitive topic, but concentrates on the shoe leather worn out by the journalists in pursuing the story, illuminating it with the details of the crimes that had been committed. It’s a subtle approach which works.
The script is lucid and the cinematography adds. "I'm gonna make him an offer he can't refuse" is an unforgettable line. The acting nominations were all well deserved. And the music is just tremendous.
A violent film. Plot is driven by women who collectively plan and fund a mission, even if the focus of the story is on the men who implement it. Clint Eastwood and Morgan Freeman superb. (Less sure about Hackman.)
Could easily have lost an hour and been better. First half has a tremendous impetus, but once the war is over, the narrative thrust has gone, and we slip into a series of somewhat disconnected episodes. Also, racism.
Iraq is a real country, with real people, but not in The Hurt Locker. Much unpleasant gore. I liked the fact that the protagonist is a real asshole. I think most of us have worked at some time or another with people like him.
2.5 hours long. Lots of people get killed. None of the characters is especially likeable. But the central theme of identity, involving two double agents operating in opposite directions, is fascinating and well executed.
A story of father/son growth with the mother walking out. To be honest they are not just "ordinary" people, they are rather dull people as well. But the leads are all strong, even if I did not think all that much of their material.
70) Birdman or (The Unexpected Virtue of Ignorance) (2014)
Central character is unattractive and it’s difficult to sympathise with his (self-inflicted) problems. Maybe I’ve read too much sf not to find it all a bit glib. Good cinematography and music.
Anti-semitism is a serious issue, but this is not a very good film about it. In the year when the state of Israel was created, there might be more than being barred from posh hotels? Wooden performance from Gregory Peck.
A few *very* funny lines, but protag thinks he is more interesting than he is, and his failed relationships are largely his own fault. We are supposed to find this sympathetic and interesting, but I found it sad and rather boring.
Harmless; I guess the wartime mood in 1944 helped this feelgood escapism went down well with the public for reasons that we can understand. I didn’t find any of it awful, but I didn’t find any of it terribly memorable either.
Higgins’ misogynistic treatment of Eliza is awful – constant negging, and pretty close to gaslighting. But there are some wonderful songs, and one or two utterly stunning visuals. My absolute favourite sequence is the Ascot scene.
It’s an unsophisticated story of two not very interesting policemen biffing the bad guys and occasionally also the good guys with whom they disagree. Admittedly it does have a couple of really brilliant moments.
I love this film very much. Sure, it's a rather skimpy romance plot, but it showcases some of George and Ira Gershwin’s best music; gorgeous cinematography, energy and music; Gene Kelly is at the height of his powers.
It’s great to look at, especially if you like to see acres of rippling male flesh (limited appeal for me). Core performances are all solid. The filmography is good and the music *really* good. But there isn’t really much there there.
Infamously, beat Citizen Kane. The tone is emotionally uneven. The various tragic events of the film seem to just happen and then life moves on to the next tragic event. Music good, looks fantastic.
He/him. International affairs strategist & expert, science fiction fan, psephologist; #APCOWorldwide, toots personal. Will block rude people and bigots. https://fromtheheartofeurope.eu