As pointed out by @lutoma (thanks!) it seems like they removed the code that auto-generates these reports, and instead instance administrators have to generate them manually (as per the kinda hidden, collapsed conversation in https://github.com/mastodon/mastodon/pull/28693/files#r1450641772)
I’ll leave the issue open as a documentation request, as there is no information on any of this unless you watch the PRs and read the source code, and also as a request to make the feature more flexible (or at least remove the cringe.)
@kkarhan I am not aware that Mastodon has integrated functionality to stop reports, does it?
If a local user were to abuse the report function, we would talk to them or kick them. If a user on a remote instance were to abuse the report function, we would talk to their administrators, and if they declined to take action, we would consider stopping federating with the instance.
In any case, I think adding that requirement to a spam manager is not the right place.
@kkarhan It is true that I and probably most #mastoadmin|s have a script to bulk resolve reports against a specific user, because the Mastodon moderation interface helpfully groups reports by user, and then gives you zero tools to resolve all of them. But that's really a three-liner script, and hopefully in only another dozen years or so even something you can do in the web interface.
So, when you block an instance as a mastodon administrator, on account of that instance spewing spam like mad and also none of your users following anybody there, this will NOT resolve any of the >100 reports your users have openend against that instance, despite the reports now being useless.
And of course, Mastodon still has no bulk editing of reports, so you die the death of a thousand ~~papercuts~~ report-clicks … or you just add report-resolving to your management script:
Imagine wondering “When’s the next time that Christmas will be a Tuesday/Wednesday, for those sweet optimal public holidays (Jan 1st being exactly a week later)?”
Now imagine asking, idk, google or Siri or god forbid an actual calendar, instead of turning to the best tool for the job: systemd.
(that’s two “Dumbledore asked calmly” posts today, which led to me getting informed that the movie that gave rise to this meme came out 19 years ago, which is WRONG wrong wrong)
When I want to have a lot of fun, I tell people who are into languages and grammar that I think that Finnish has cases and Hungarian doesn't. We call this a scissor statement, and it's great, because
· it’s kinda-somewhat representing a majority position · it sounds completely stupid, especially when you don't know more than that the two are related, and then it sounds like a real headache when you know that all the ~15 Finnish cases have a clear relative in Hungarian.
Related: Is there something like a caniuse.com newsfeed that tells me when a feature has become supported by all major browsers (or, ideally, supported by major browsers for a month, half a year, a year …)?
Imagine if web.dev, the web development blog by the Chrome team, had the latest coolest tech like … RSS feeds for their blog. Then you could just subscribe to https://web.dev/series/baseline-newly-available and get notified about newly availble CSS features …
(To add insult to injury, they load their list of blog posts via JS, so you can't even point a good feed reader at the /blog/ page and have it scrape for new posts. Eww.)
Other open source project maintainers: Have you heard of https://reuse.software/ ? What's your opinion, if you have any?
I'm mostly not super interested in the hassle of adding a license header to every of my files. Maybe I'm just not in the target group, as my project is under one single license and I haven't had the need for a bill of materials etc? #reusesoftware#spdx
@JorgeR_N@senficon@leah Es waren wirklich die allermeisten sehr fair im Umgang mit uns, und wir haben ja heute als Antwort auch noch mal an den neuen Regeln gedreht. Aber danke für die Fürsorge!
Dass die Instanz dadurch etwas kleiner wird, war vorhersehbar und ist mehr als in Ordnung - wie gesagt, wir wollen ja eben nicht eine Institution sein, sondern lieber eine von vielen Instanzen in unserem Umfeld, wo Leute frei nach Vorlieben ihre Heimat aussuchen können.