@atomicpoet True. But nevertheless sticking to it seems like good conduct.
Notices by Riku Mattila (rmattila74@mastodo.fi)
-
Embed this notice
Riku Mattila (rmattila74@mastodo.fi)'s status on Friday, 05-May-2023 16:50:52 JST Riku Mattila -
Embed this notice
Riku Mattila (rmattila74@mastodo.fi)'s status on Friday, 05-May-2023 16:50:40 JST Riku Mattila @jo @atomicpoet It is an accessibility issue. For people with physical limitations, participating in discussion gets increasingly unequal, the longer the posts become. I for example can only type 200-300 characters before pausing to rest my eyes. Anything over 500 is practically off-limits for me. Which is OK if done on purpose but something many people don't automatically realize.
-
Embed this notice
Riku Mattila (rmattila74@mastodo.fi)'s status on Friday, 05-May-2023 15:44:50 JST Riku Mattila @atomicpoet Even if you can, it doesn't necessarily mean you should. I think the 500-character limit is good.