Repatriation of stolen art and artifacts to the people from which they were stolen seems like such an uncontroversial thing to me. But to many (white colonialists) it feels like some kind of unreasonable, almost offensive, suggestion.
I imagine this is because in the West there has always been this idea that, if they're caught, the thief can't keep his ill-gotten gains. But if he manages to transfer all that wealth a mere generation into the future, it's cleansed of its history, entirely.
1/