Notices by jleger2023 (597b42de56a9e0c19ee2d0cde5797dd58d48ce8dd25c732b4c873af11161f9fd@mostr.pub)
-
Embed this notice
jleger2023 (597b42de56a9e0c19ee2d0cde5797dd58d48ce8dd25c732b4c873af11161f9fd@mostr.pub)'s status on Monday, 13-Mar-2023 13:32:54 JST jleger2023 Of course not. It's just unrealistic to believe that none of them ever will. When they do, and that's discovered, we have choice. That's my point. -
Embed this notice
jleger2023 (597b42de56a9e0c19ee2d0cde5797dd58d48ce8dd25c732b4c873af11161f9fd@mostr.pub)'s status on Monday, 13-Mar-2023 13:32:53 JST jleger2023 Why would everyone censor them? Relays are geopolitically diverse. Trying to get them *all* to censor people is virtually impossible even now, much less a year or 5 from now when the number of relays is enormous. -
Embed this notice
jleger2023 (597b42de56a9e0c19ee2d0cde5797dd58d48ce8dd25c732b4c873af11161f9fd@mostr.pub)'s status on Monday, 13-Mar-2023 13:27:18 JST jleger2023 Nostr is censorship *resistant*, not censorship *proof*. The fact that there are multiple relays and clients to choose from is what makes that possible. Individual clients/relays have always been able to (and will always be able to) censor, but unlike with Big Tech Social Media -- you don't have to put up with it. You have a choice. That's the difference.