I guess I was thinking that it's an idea to post it without going through with it.
We all have a good hypothesis, and I agree with you on what the likely outcome would be.
The 2nd layer of this is to show why the ARRL will not make an inclusion statement now or in the near future; it would trigger much of their demographic (both members and potential members).
Change will have to come from the bottom as has been mentioned in this thread.