are you familiar with the phrase "my way or the high way"? that's what your argument amounts to, and it's not a cool position at all. it's not even ethical.

imposing values and behavior though the software is exactly the control and colonization I'm getting at

it's not a given that people can choose not to use the software, as many programs are imposed taxing software

but even if they can opt out, it is still the case that you stand for imposing values, controlling and colonizing users through the software they use.

those who opt out don't use the software, so they're not (your) users, and that's exactly what they need to do to defend freedom

whereas all those who choose to use the software licensed under such abusive terms are indeed controlled and colonized, because of the terms it imposes in a misguided, false and broken analogy with copyleft. I can elaborate on why the analogy is misguided, false and broken if you wish.