Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://mastodon.social/users/heidilifeldman/statuses/114509422788782955">Heidi Li Feldman (heidilifeldman@mastodon.social)'s status on Thursday, 15-May-2025 11:52:20 JST</a><a href="https://mastodon.social/@heidilifeldman" title="heidilifeldman@mastodon.social"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/14479-48-20250118090045.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Heidi Li Feldman" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Heidi Li Feldman</a></section><article><p>Hannah C. Dugan, the Wisconsin judge the feds arrested for allegedly obstructing ICE, has filed a wonderful motion to dismiss the entire case against her. My copy with my annotations at <a href="https://drive.proton.me/urls/YSVCCN8N5M#seabLmxl0gFa" rel="nofollow">https://drive.proton.me/urls/YSVCCN8N5M#seabLmxl0gFa</a>.<br>A good portion of the brief rests on and repeatedly cites Trump v. U.S., bc Dugan argues that she is protected from suit by absolute judicial immunity. 1/ <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/LawFedi" rel="tag">#LawFedi</a></p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/5055587#notice-9911069">In conversation</a><time datetime="2025-05-15T11:52:20+09:00" title="Thursday, 15-May-2025 11:52:20 JST">about a month ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://mastodon.social/@heidilifeldman/114509422788782955" rel="external" title="Sent from mastodon.social via ActivityPub">mastodon.social</a></span></span><a href="https://mastodon.social/@heidilifeldman/114509422788782955">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><label><a rel="external" href="https://gnusocial.jp/attachment/4628393">The problems with this prosecution are legion, but most immediately, the
government cannot prosecute Judge Dugan because she is entitled to judicial immunity for her official acts. Immunity is not a defense to the prosecution to be determined later by a jury or court; it is an absolute bar to the prosecution at the outset. See Trump v. United States, 603 U.S. 593, 630 (2024).</a></label><br><a href="https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/114/509/422/483/310/118/original/dae0569053a6b9a3.png" rel="external">https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/114/509/422/483/310/118/original/dae0569053a6b9a3.png</a></li><li><article><header><div>Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: drive.proton.me</div><h5><a href="https://drive.proton.me/urls/YSVCCN8N5M#seabLmxl0gFa">Proton Drive</a></h5><div></div></header><div>Securely store, share, and access your important files and photos. Anytime, anywhere.</div><footer></footer></article></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Heidi Li Feldman (heidilifeldman@mastodon.social)'s status on Thursday, 15-May-2025 11:52:20 JST Heidi Li Feldman
Hannah C. Dugan, the Wisconsin judge the feds arrested for allegedly obstructing ICE, has filed a wonderful motion to dismiss the entire case against her. My copy with my annotations at https://drive.proton.me/urls/YSVCCN8N5M#seabLmxl0gFa.
A good portion of the brief rests on and repeatedly cites Trump v. U.S., bc Dugan argues that she is protected from suit by absolute judicial immunity. 1/ #LawFedi
In conversationabout a month ago from mastodon.socialpermalink
Attachments
1. The problems with this prosecution are legion, but most immediately, the government cannot prosecute Judge Dugan because she is entitled to judicial immunity for her official acts. Immunity is not a defense to the prosecution to be determined later by a jury or court; it is an absolute bar to the prosecution at the outset. See Trump v. United States, 603 U.S. 593, 630 (2024).
  https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/114/509/422/483/310/118/original/dae0569053a6b9a3.png
2. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: drive.proton.me
  Proton Drive
  Securely store, share, and access your important files and photos. Anytime, anywhere.

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice